Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:12.98 airfie
But it's also ridiculously light. And small, which means materials for the body are cheap, which means more money to be spent on fancy parts.
As a result, it's fast!
Posts: 695
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2015 1:22 pm
Location: California, USA
Cars: 1966 Sunbeam Alpine
1997 Ford Crown Victoria
Corbanx wrote:Strop i really like ur fwd design and im pretty sure it can do it in under 1.20.00 but if i let you post a second car as much as I like it i would have to let everyone post a second car and it would just get crazy with revisions of 2 models per person and all that. Thats the only reson I cant allow it in.
Queen of Track Building
Posts: 1613
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:47 am
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Cars: Chevy Cobalt
Queen of Track Building
Posts: 1613
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:47 am
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Cars: Chevy Cobalt
07CobaltGirl wrote:Well, I didn't say everybody was using a turbo. But the vast majority are. haha
Supercharged
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2014 4:50 pm
Location: Auckland NewZealand
Cars: None :(
Elouda wrote:Not a submission (I decided I would stick with the front-engine when I started this), but I was curious just how much better a mid-engine body would be.
As it turns out, a lot.
Queen of Track Building
Posts: 1613
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:47 am
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Cars: Chevy Cobalt
strop wrote:That's a very odd downforce distribution!
If that's the case I'll tune up my submission and see if I can match/better it so you can keep the front engine
Return to Community Challenges & Competitions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests