Top15 sports car challenge (1st Strop 1:12.19 airfield)
Ah. I see where I went wrong. I was thinking in MPG terms, where higher is better.
I have no clue how he got a mid engine to do that. The mid engine one I wanted to use, couldn't even fit a tiny engine in it. I have to go back to the drawing board tomorrow!
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:16:93 airfie
LEADERBOARDS UPDATED
thanks again for the participation for all of you making this something fun.
Manche got disqualified sin he/she has a efficiency of 12.5MPG my bad for no realizing before.Anyways you are more than welcome to resubmit another vehicle(or the same one) that meets the minimun requirements to participate.
thanks again for the participation for all of you making this something fun.
Manche got disqualified sin he/she has a efficiency of 12.5MPG my bad for no realizing before.Anyways you are more than welcome to resubmit another vehicle(or the same one) that meets the minimun requirements to participate.
Rate my builds http://www.automationhub.net/company-ca ... ompany/233 (work in progress)
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:16:93 airfie
If you're using a small MR body, try fitting it transversely. Both the Giugiaro wedge and the small modern MR fit larger engines that way. Though with the engine I'm using, it's only 2.4L and then the fun part is trying to fit twin-scrolls in without making the length too long 
As you can see, it's not the most powerful engine on this board by a long shot. However, the MR cars in Automation have one big advantage: you don't have to AWD to get maximum performance because using a heavier engine puts more weight on the rear wheels, giving better launch. Second, all the MR cars accomodate ridiculously wide rear tyres, and the less weight up front means you can have narrower front wheels = saves money. Also, you can put both wings on the rear no problem, and if you add active wing, you'll maximise benefit whatever your settings may be.
Also, the small MR car is light. Never mind the output, the power to weight ratio is far superior:
Here we are, looking every bit the budget sports car. Except stripped out as this one is, with such a ridiculous engine, I would expect more like supercar performance.
I couldn't be bothered using active suspension. It's expensive, heavy, and you can't tweak things as much to your liking. Using some old school tuning, this thing will out-drag and out-corner a Huayra, Huracan, F12... take your pick. Its Green Hell time is also pretty quick too
p.s. if anybody would like it, I do have the .lua files all zipped up ready to submit.
As you can see, it's not the most powerful engine on this board by a long shot. However, the MR cars in Automation have one big advantage: you don't have to AWD to get maximum performance because using a heavier engine puts more weight on the rear wheels, giving better launch. Second, all the MR cars accomodate ridiculously wide rear tyres, and the less weight up front means you can have narrower front wheels = saves money. Also, you can put both wings on the rear no problem, and if you add active wing, you'll maximise benefit whatever your settings may be.
Also, the small MR car is light. Never mind the output, the power to weight ratio is far superior:
Here we are, looking every bit the budget sports car. Except stripped out as this one is, with such a ridiculous engine, I would expect more like supercar performance.
I couldn't be bothered using active suspension. It's expensive, heavy, and you can't tweak things as much to your liking. Using some old school tuning, this thing will out-drag and out-corner a Huayra, Huracan, F12... take your pick. Its Green Hell time is also pretty quick too
p.s. if anybody would like it, I do have the .lua files all zipped up ready to submit.
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:16:93 airfie
Corbanx wrote:*Minimum requirements
-less than 2500 cc
-must cost less than 16.000$
-fuel efficiency better than 14 l/100km ----16.8mpg US-----20.1mpg UK
-weight less than 1400kg
-sportiness higher than 40
-Reliability higher than 65
-safety higher than 25
-No semi slicks
-Year 2015
-2 or 3 door
I just realized, the leader actually was using semi slicks! I was wondering why I couldn't get below 17 no mater how hard I tried. D:
Also, I don't think that car you just posted will ever be beaten. I can't even get near that, even with a MR set up lol.
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:16:93 airfie
Perhaps so, but fear not, sport tyres will still allow you to get well into the 1:15s, maybe beyond, with the right adjustments to that body!
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:16:93 airfie
strop wrote:Perhaps so, but fear not, sport tyres will still allow you to get well into the 1:15s, maybe beyond, with the right adjustments to that body!
I spent about an hour balancing out all of the suspension to get the best lap time I could. I think I need an engine with a flatter torque curve, than the really high revving one that has a huge jump halfway up the power band.
Supercharged
Posts: 1983
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:07 pm
Location: Northeast USA
Cars: 2006 Scion Xb
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:16:93 airfie
Sorry Corbanx I use us mpg. My revision will be posted in metric.
Chief designer and CEO, Centauri motor works, Centauri Performance Vehicles (CPV)
"Centauri: The Stars Are Within Your Reach."
Centauri engines Centauri cars
CPV engines CPV cars
Company ID: 1943047
"Centauri: The Stars Are Within Your Reach."
Centauri engines Centauri cars
CPV engines CPV cars
Company ID: 1943047
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:16:93 airfie
Sports Coupe revision!
it was with semi slicks!
now with sports compound tires
it was with semi slicks!
now with sports compound tires
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:16:93 airfie
My turn, 2nd least powerful (currently) but..... let's see my 2 litres of fun
SBA - Storm Feather (trim)



SBA - Storm Feather (trim)



My Factory:
South Bangkok Autoworks (SBA) Inc. EST. 1962
South Bangkok Autoworks (SBA) Inc. EST. 1962
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:12.98 airfie
LEADERBOARDS UPDATED.
I hope u guys are enjoying this as much as I am.
Also thanks for letting me know about people using illegal stuff you guys are being really helpful
I hope u guys are enjoying this as much as I am.
Also thanks for letting me know about people using illegal stuff you guys are being really helpful
Rate my builds http://www.automationhub.net/company-ca ... ompany/233 (work in progress)
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:12.98 airfie
Corbanx wrote:LEADERBOARDS UPDATED.
I hope u guys are enjoying this as much as I am.
Also thanks for letting me know about people using illegal stuff you guys are being really helpful
You didn't update his time on the leaderboard, he still has the time he had with the slicks, his time went down quite a bit with the sports compound tires.
Posts: 695
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2015 1:22 pm
Location: California, USA
Cars: 1966 Sunbeam Alpine
1997 Ford Crown Victoria
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:12.98 airfie
Redacted:
Missed Reliability by a point.
Missed Reliability by a point.
Posts: 695
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2015 1:22 pm
Location: California, USA
Cars: 1966 Sunbeam Alpine
1997 Ford Crown Victoria
Re: The small sports car challenge (Best time 1:12.98 airfie
Sayonara wrote:Obligatory FWD CR-X.
Failed to meet minimum safety requirement / engine not shown
Return to Community Challenges & Competitions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests



