FAQ  •  Login

Minivan Homologation Special Challenge (Cancelled)

<<

Awildgermanappears

User avatar

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 205

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:11 am

Location: Germany

Cars: Nissan Note

Post Tue Jan 05, 2016 3:30 pm

Minivan Homologation Special Challenge (Cancelled)

First off to make this clear this is not officially a challenge yet, just an idea I have had recently.
Image
The Premise:
Since Minivans are pretty much the anti-christ to car enthusiasts, I decided to change that by asking the community to develop a Minivan that isn't totally sleep inducing. To give the whole ordeal something of a context, lets imagine someone had the glorious idea of a production based Minivan racing series, using a Group A esque set of rules. This obviously means that there need to be both a Homologation version and a Race version of the Vehicle in question. Which leads leads me nicely to:

The Rules (under construction, will be fleshed out if you guys show sufficient interest):
- Tech year is 2012
- Vehicles require a Minivan-esque body (for added variety Van & SUV bodies are eligible as well, a full list of eligible bodies will be determined later on)
- Age of the body is irrelevant
- Players may base their entries on already existing models.

- Homologation version and Race version must be visually identical (excluding colour)

- Engines must be from the same family, homologation has to use a street legal exhaust etc.
- Number and layout of cylinders, displacement, head type, fuel system and aspiration are unrestricted (keep it somewhat realistic please)
- No CNC parts
- Output of the Race version may not exceed 400hp, Homologation version is unrestricted
- All engine layouts and drivetrains are eligible and must be identical between Homologation and Race
- Max tire width for Homologation special is 255mm on all four wheels, Race can have 265mm
- Max rim size for the race version is 19", wheel must be made from aluminium
- No use of quality sliders for wheels
- Homologation and Race must use the same brake disks and calipers, race may use more aggressive brake pads
- No fully clad and downforce undertrays
- No active aero
- Homologation has to use 6 seats minimum and all driver assists except launch control
- Race must use Sport interior with -15 quality, NO driver assists and advanced safety
- Homologation may use any type of springs, dampers and sway bars
- Race version is not allowed to use any active suspension components whatsoever.
- Minimum safety requirement: 50


The Judging Process:
The race version will only be judged by its laptime around a nondescript track. Much more interesting will be the Homologation special, which will not only be judged by its performance (acceleration, handling etc.) but also Practicality, Utility, Safety, Comfort, Drivability, Fuel economy and Running costs in descending order.
As a bonus I'll probably do a beauty contest in which I let the public decide which contestant is the best looking and least embarrassing. It will be weighted seperately and added to the final score.

I want to emphasize that it is still undecided if I actually do this and that the rule set and judging process are still in need of tweaking. Feedback is very much welcome and wanted.
Thanks for your time.
Last edited by Awildgermanappears on Sun Mar 06, 2016 11:30 am, edited 5 times in total.
IMP Automotive Empire:

IMP Automobilbau
Monolith Motors
LaVache Horseless Carriages
<<

Madrias

Posts: 437

Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 5:15 am

Cars: 2005 Hyundai Elantra GT

Post Tue Jan 05, 2016 4:30 pm

Re: Community Challenge Idea (Contains Minivans)

I'd throw a van into it. Sure I could find a way to make my personal favorite type of car into a non-sleep-inducing, fire-spitting, screaming nightmare. I've toyed around with the idea of some interesting racing vans, and minivans that wouldn't be a bore to drive.
<<

strop

User avatar

3-Star Beta Tester
3-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 3462

Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:31 pm

Cars: Honda Civic VTI-S MY13

Post Tue Jan 05, 2016 7:38 pm

Re: Community Challenge Idea (Contains Minivans)

Weight shedding is encouraged (no abuse of tech sliders obviously)


You will absolutely need to clarify this, because it is the single most vaguest thing about any tournament. Given you said 'No use of quality sliders' in the previous point about the homologation version, is this to mean that you can't use tech sliders for the interior tabs either?

If so, that bugs me because the tech sliders in the interior etc. tab actually can play a large role in finetuning the balance of your car, but also, imposing a blanket restriction like that doesn't reflect any kind of realistic reasoning. It'd be better to specify some specific limitations that better simulate real conditions, for example:

  • Safety of both homologation and race version must be 40 or greater (i.e. legal for sale in Fruinia)
  • Race version should use sports seats of tech at least 0 (or something like that, this kind of limitation is ok because there's no cost limit on the race version, otherwise I wouldn't even limit this because sports seats are expensive)
If greater safety is still important, make it a weighted component of scoring. For the most part, safety plays an important role in most, if not all the market tabs.
<<

HighOctaneLove

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 573

Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 10:44 am

Location: Brisbane, Australia

Cars: 1997 Toyota Starlet Life 3dr

Post Tue Jan 05, 2016 11:31 pm

Re: Community Challenge Idea (Contains Minivans)

By 2012 VVL is common-use so to arbitrarily exclude this tech makes no sense.

Allowing differences between the homologation car such as different gearboxes also doesn't make sense as the purpose of the homologation car is to ratify a specification that cannot be deviated from. This is why a minimum build count was specified and why a number of otherwise un-interesting cars became collectible; they're rare road legal racers without slicks and add road legal interior and exhaust.

So, for the comp the two cars would be identical in brakes, engine, gearbox, suspension etc. but the road car would be de-tuned, suspension softened, a better interior installed, and a street legal exhaust installed.

I would prepare something for this competition; we need more "left-field" competitions!
Bogliq Automotive #1929007
Leeroy Racecraft #1930086
<<

nialloftara

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 1983

Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:07 pm

Location: Northeast USA

Cars: 2006 Scion Xb

Post Wed Jan 06, 2016 12:29 am

Re: Community Challenge Idea (Contains Minivans)

Save yourself a lot of headache by amending these

- Engines must be identical, however the Race car is allowed to use a more agressive cam profile, higher (or lower) redline, more boost, race intake, race exhaust headers and larger bore exhaust pipes
- Number and layout of cylinders, displacement, head type, fuel system and aspiration are unrestricted (keep it somewhat realistic please)
- No magnesium block, billet steel crankshaft or titanium connecting rods

To this
Engine must remain in the same family with no CNC parts
Chief designer and CEO, Centauri motor works, Centauri Performance Vehicles (CPV)
"Centauri: The Stars Are Within Your Reach."
Centauri engines Centauri cars
CPV engines CPV cars
Company ID: 1943047
<<

Awildgermanappears

User avatar

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 205

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:11 am

Location: Germany

Cars: Nissan Note

Post Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:15 am

Re: Community Challenge Idea (Contains Minivans) EDITED

Changed a few of the rules, let me know if there are still some stupid ones.
IMP Automotive Empire:

IMP Automobilbau
Monolith Motors
LaVache Horseless Carriages
<<

strop

User avatar

3-Star Beta Tester
3-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 3462

Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:31 pm

Cars: Honda Civic VTI-S MY13

Post Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:27 am

Re: Community Challenge Idea (Contains Minivans) EDITED

Are there now any tech slider restrictions on safety, or a minimum requirement?
<<

Awildgermanappears

User avatar

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 205

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:11 am

Location: Germany

Cars: Nissan Note

Post Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:37 am

Re: Community Challenge Idea (Contains Minivans) EDITED

strop wrote:Are there now any tech slider restrictions on safety, or a minimum requirement?

Not yet, first I'll have to build a test vehicle to get a vague idea of what is what.
IMP Automotive Empire:

IMP Automobilbau
Monolith Motors
LaVache Horseless Carriages
<<

nialloftara

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 1983

Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:07 pm

Location: Northeast USA

Cars: 2006 Scion Xb

Post Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:40 am

Re: Community Challenge Idea (Contains Minivans) EDITED

For the race suspension settings, are semi active and adaptive allowed?
Chief designer and CEO, Centauri motor works, Centauri Performance Vehicles (CPV)
"Centauri: The Stars Are Within Your Reach."
Centauri engines Centauri cars
CPV engines CPV cars
Company ID: 1943047
<<

Awildgermanappears

User avatar

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 205

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:11 am

Location: Germany

Cars: Nissan Note

Post Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:55 am

Re: Community Challenge Idea (Contains Minivans) EDITED

nialloftara wrote:For the race suspension settings, are semi active and adaptive allowed?

Adaptive yes, semi active no
IMP Automotive Empire:

IMP Automobilbau
Monolith Motors
LaVache Horseless Carriages
<<

Dragawn

User avatar

Turbocharged
Turbocharged

Posts: 391

Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:02 am

Cars: A high tech sportscar consisting entirely of air!

Post Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:09 am

Re: Minivan Homologation Special Challenge (EDITED)

This challenge looks properly interesting, but may I ask why driveability is so far down in the order for the judging of the homologation model? Wouldn't it be easier to weigh these stats? (next to performance if you don't want to use sportiness for that)
<<

Manche

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 605

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:22 pm

Location: Montevideo. Uruguay

Cars: none.... sadly

Post Wed Jan 06, 2016 6:35 am

Re: Minivan Homologation Special Challenge (EDITED)

can both versions use Hydropneumatic suspension?

I have a 400 hp 1450 Kg monster capable of 295 km/h (used the big mpv body)
<<

Awildgermanappears

User avatar

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 205

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2015 7:11 am

Location: Germany

Cars: Nissan Note

Post Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:04 am

Re: Minivan Homologation Special Challenge (EDITED)

Manche wrote:can both versions use Hydropneumatic suspension?

I have a 400 hp 1450 Kg monster capable of 295 km/h (used the big mpv body)

No.
On that note, I might need to develop a BoP system for that body.
IMP Automotive Empire:

IMP Automobilbau
Monolith Motors
LaVache Horseless Carriages
<<

Manche

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 605

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:22 pm

Location: Montevideo. Uruguay

Cars: none.... sadly

Post Thu Jan 07, 2016 2:31 am

Re: Minivan Homologation Special Challenge (EDITED)

Awildgermanappears wrote:
Manche wrote:can both versions use Hydropneumatic suspension?

I have a 400 hp 1450 Kg monster capable of 295 km/h (used the big mpv body)

No.
On that note, I might need to develop a BoP system for that body.


then how it's supposed to be?

because I use Hydro all all my luxury builds
<<

koolkei

User avatar

Posts: 947

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 10:35 pm

Cars: a mini 2 wheeled single cyl car :D

Post Thu Jan 07, 2016 3:10 am

Re: Minivan Homologation Special Challenge (EDITED)

wait.... im having difficulty differentiating wagons vs minivans.....

and minivans vs full sized vans....
Next

Return to Community Challenges & Competitions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron