'16 ARCHom *RESULTS 15-4*

[Sillyworld]

Now where do I submit my designs!

EDIT:
Think I found It?

Don't post your design here, otherwise the competition may copy it Send the zip via pm to vri404.

[Vri404]

EDIT:
Think I found It?

I will not Accept this design until it follows the naming convention for the contest, and it is PM'd to me.

Regards

~Vri

[Vri404]

List of entries updated. PMs have been sent to DQ'd entries.

[DeusExMackia]

Introducing the entrant from Erin into the Automation Rally Championship Homologation....

The 2016 Erin Merna!

AutomationHub Page: http://www.automationhub.net/company-ca ... rmodel/594

[Vri404]

I am implementing a new rule. For every 1L you are below the minimum fuel economy (To the nearest full L), you will be loosing 5 points to your final score.

[Sillyworld]

I am implementing a new rule.

ಠ_ಠ

[acemaster25]

He could have phrased it better

like-
"I am changing the hard rule that you need to have 10km/L or better in fuel economy and I am now instead docking 5 points off your final score for every Liter you are under."

[Vri404]

Yeah, I could've. You're both above that Limit. One entry was below, and I was having annoyances with that person, so instead of getting a revised entry, I implemented that. So, you could be below that limit, it just may make it harder to win.

[strop]

You don't have a rule listed about limited number of revisions, so that kind of decision is still slightly arbitrary and any ಠ_ಠs directed your way may be justified.

And if I max out the bore and stroke limits on my engine and you tell us in the next round that there's a displacement limit, definitely for sure you will earn much more than a mere ಠ_ಠ from me!

[Vri404]

I'm gonna leave it open, but do some other ways to restrict it.

such as a power:weight ratio and such.

not 100% on this at the moment.

[strop]

I'm quite happy with severe penalties for going over, as opposed to straight up disqualifying.

However, I also recommend that you offer a revision in light of any actual rule changes, just in case!

[Vri404]

I implemented that rule, as I'd had to get a few revisions from that person, so I'd given up. They were also being a hassle to work with.

Also, for part 2, the HP:KG ratio will either be 0.25hp:kg, 0.4hp:kg, or 0.5hp:kg. I'm currently unsure.

[Sillyworld]

I think 0.3 could be a good value. The current WRC rules sets the minimum weight to 1200kg and the power of the cars is around 300-350hp (restricted by a restrictor plate).
350hp/1200kg = 0.2999... hp/kg

[Vri404]

6-7 days remain. The Lack of entries disturbs me. I should start planning for Part 2.

Now, how do you make a track...?

[strop]

Good question, ever since the update, it may have changed a bit!

I do plan to make an entry, except I don't have time until next week.