The G-force challenge

[UMGaming]

The basic Idea is to make the most G-forces for any leaderboard that you choose, there is one leaderboard for Maximium Lateral G's, One for Longitudinal G's and ten more for 5 tracks (2 for each track).

Rules For Overall best Lateral and Longitudinal G Forces:
Must post a pic of aleast the G-force chart.
Must state which leaderboard it is for.

Rules for Track G-forces:
Must post a pic of the whole test track testing page with the G-force chart visible.
Must state which leaderboard it is for.





































Be aware I will be adding the already submitted G-forces to the leaderboards tomorrow.

[koolkei]

sooo... is this a challenge or a competition?

[KLinardo]

Because at some point you have to slow down from a 300 MPH straight.

[UMGaming]

sooo... is this a challenge or a competition?

challenge to make the most g force, I thought I'd put it here because this is the Community Challenges & Competitions forum

[strop]

I suspect this doesn't count, because I may have broken BROBOT...

2015-11-29_00003.jpg (353.4 KiB) Viewed 7610 times

Note: this is done on a super banked 'velodrome' track (which I haven't drawn yet), with 2km straights punctuated by 70 degree banked, uh, amphitheaters. I think the 9.3g is a bogus reading, but even my not-500km/h cars pull F1 level Gs on it...

EDIT: much better, adding a straight so the simulation doesn't end on the corner fixes the aberrant cornering. Now I'm getting a reading of 6.1g, which is much more, uh... realistic?

[Vri404]

"Realistic"

[strop]

Honestly I was quite excited to see what my company cars would pull on BROBOT... seeing the dot waving around so wildly outside of the circle only reinforces the notion that driving them at full tilt will actually turn you into mush... Now all I need to wait for is derestricted aero and revamped turbos and multi turbos + superchargers, and all my dreams will come true.

[Vri404]

Strop is either Powercrazy, Insane, or both. I cannot tell... I'm going with Both.

[UMGaming]

I suspect this doesn't count, because I may have broken BROBOT...


Note: this is done on a super banked 'velodrome' track (which I haven't drawn yet), with 2km straights punctuated by 70 degree banked, uh, amphitheaters. I think the 9.3g is a bogus reading, but even my not-500km/h cars pull F1 level Gs on it...

EDIT: much better, adding a straight so the simulation doesn't end on the corner fixes the aberrant cornering. Now I'm getting a reading of 6.1g, which is much more, uh... realistic?

It counts as long as thats what it reads in game

[koolkei]

i dont understand... what is wrong with the turbos right now??

[strop]

They lack a lot of tech, meaning the car's drivability suffers the full brunt of its spooling and lag. I'm hoping (and it has been suggested that these will happen) for things like more ECU control, different sized turbos, variable geometry etc. And superchargers were always planned for later.

[thecarlover]

I wonder if we'll get twincharger setups at some point...

[salen00b]

I think I broke the game...

2015-11-29_00001.jpg (205.15 KiB) Viewed 7482 times

But then I noticed the banking was inverted.

2015-11-29_00007.jpg (206.24 KiB) Viewed 7482 times

[strop]

Wait, what kind of corner is that supposed to be?

Somebody edit nardo to have ridiculous banking and see what we can get

[salen00b]

Wait, what kind of corner is that supposed to be?

It is a track I'm fiddling on, the background is a place holder
The corner in question is a 100m radius 360 loop with 90 degree banking.