FAQ  •  Login

BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [Qualifying R5]

<<

TrackpadUser

User avatar

2-Star Beta Tester
2-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 877

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:20 pm

Location: Montreal, Canadia

Cars: 2006 Suzuki Swift+

Post Mon May 11, 2015 8:07 pm

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

With slicks I imagine?

IIRC Der Bayer is slightly tuning tire wear, so there is more wear at first and then it tapers off slowly to a minimum of .5 grip (or something like that)

I seriously think I will run sports this time, especially since it ends up only 1 second slower compared to slicks.
<<

strop

User avatar

3-Star Beta Tester
3-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 3462

Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:31 pm

Cars: Honda Civic VTI-S MY13

Post Mon May 11, 2015 8:15 pm

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

TheBobWiley wrote:So close to sub 2:40 on Automation Test Track... come on suspension tune, work with me!
As much as I want to use the coupe body, there is no contest with the custom roadster, solid 8 seconds faster with just a basic tune over my highly tuned land barge "coupe".


That's exactly it!

And like trackpad I've decided I'll run sports, though, with the slicks, like Bob, one finds oneself tantalisingly close to a sub 2:40...
<<

TheBobWiley

Posts: 282

Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:12 am

Location: Ohio

Cars: Volvo V60

Post Mon May 11, 2015 8:45 pm

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

Just a little teaser of my race car :P
Wait for it change, its a gif.
Image
Last edited by TheBobWiley on Wed May 13, 2015 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Owner of Ankomst Automotive
Established 22nd March, 1945
--Avundsjukan vilar aldrig (Envy Never Rests)--
<<

JasonPoland

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 164

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:07 pm

Location: Poznan, Poland

Cars: none

Post Tue May 12, 2015 12:33 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

I think that I made a stupid move by choosing a body that so far nobody used in this contest. It took me an hour to set everything up, I have like 0,199 hp/kg and 2:43.500 on the Automation track. That makes me want to quit already :(
<<

BlastersPewPew

Posts: 628

Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:01 am

Cars: Mazda 3

Post Tue May 12, 2015 12:41 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

JasonPoland wrote:I think that I made a stupid move by choosing a body that so far nobody used in this contest. It took me an hour to set everything up, I have like 0,199 hp/kg and 2:43.500 on the Automation track. That makes me want to quit already :(


That is faster than mine so dont worry ;)
<<

JasonPoland

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 164

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 8:07 pm

Location: Poznan, Poland

Cars: none

Post Tue May 12, 2015 12:54 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

...erm...Blaster...I thimk my game is fooling me, cause somehow now I just can't repeat that time
<<

BlastersPewPew

Posts: 628

Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:01 am

Cars: Mazda 3

Post Tue May 12, 2015 12:59 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

Ouch, wonder if it was a glitch? I find it amazing though how one little click can save or add 5 seconds to a time......
<<

TrackpadUser

User avatar

2-Star Beta Tester
2-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 877

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:20 pm

Location: Montreal, Canadia

Cars: 2006 Suzuki Swift+

Post Tue May 12, 2015 3:36 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

Suspension thing I imagine?

Is it possible that in one case you have oversteer issues, but not in the other? Because that would explain it.

Oversteery cars tend to get mediocre times.

Also, about those sub 2:40 times, they are definitively possible on slicks. And maybe even on sports with some tweaking.
<<

VicVictory

User avatar

2-Star Beta Tester
2-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 1113

Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:32 am

Cars: A MURRICAN truck and a turbo grocery getter.

Post Tue May 12, 2015 3:50 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

trackpaduser wrote:Also, about those sub 2:40 times, they are definitively possible on slicks. And maybe even on sports with some tweaking.


"Some" tweaking.

Some.

Meh, Ardent's going to withdraw from the BRC. I thought sub 2:47 was going to suffice. I don't have the knowledge (much less the time) to find a way to tweak that down anywhere close. Clearly I have learned nothing about performance builds from repeated competition running, so why waste the space? I might qualify, but not do anything more than that. Might as well let my spot go to someone who still gives a crap.
Ardent Motors Corporation
Company ID: 1934101
http://www.automationhub.net/company-catalog&companyID=40

Suzume Motor Manufacturing Industries
Company ID: 1975102
http://www.automationhub.net/company-catalog&companyID=60
<<

pyrlix

User avatar

23 Star Beta Tester
23 Star Beta Tester

Posts: 816

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:51 am

Location: Ludwigshafen/Germany

Cars: Alfa Romeo 159 1.9JTS
Opel Vivaro 2.0CDTI SE

Post Tue May 12, 2015 3:54 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

Sub 2:40 :D Holy christ! I am sitting here with a solid 2:45
Image
<Killrob> you commited a lot of crimes... among others against: 1) international minimum intelligence laws 2) human rights to a brain 3) act against devolution of the human mind
<<

TheBobWiley

Posts: 282

Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:12 am

Location: Ohio

Cars: Volvo V60

Post Tue May 12, 2015 4:14 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

Hello 2:39.98 :)
Also, I don't know if GH will make a showing for 1955 race, but I'm on the hunt for sub 9:20.00 if possible. My car's engine is probably far from the optimal hp/weight/top speed ratio, but 232 mph doesn't seem bad with 7.1s 0-100km.

Looking forward to the first practice session, any word when that will be so I can get my car submitted for it?
Owner of Ankomst Automotive
Established 22nd March, 1945
--Avundsjukan vilar aldrig (Envy Never Rests)--
<<

TrackpadUser

User avatar

2-Star Beta Tester
2-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 877

Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:20 pm

Location: Montreal, Canadia

Cars: 2006 Suzuki Swift+

Post Tue May 12, 2015 4:21 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

I hope that speed is in KPH :D

Because 232 mph is a tad fast
<<

TheBobWiley

Posts: 282

Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:12 am

Location: Ohio

Cars: Volvo V60

Post Tue May 12, 2015 4:40 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

HAHA, your correct, meant to say kph. I use mph here but kph in Automation so I mix the words up often.
Also, small V8s rule yet again. A super rough tune of a crossplane V8 dropped 2 seconds off my I6 engine's time..... Time to tune a new engine :\
Owner of Ankomst Automotive
Established 22nd March, 1945
--Avundsjukan vilar aldrig (Envy Never Rests)--
<<

strop

User avatar

3-Star Beta Tester
3-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 3462

Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:31 pm

Cars: Honda Civic VTI-S MY13

Post Tue May 12, 2015 5:07 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

VicVictory wrote:
trackpaduser wrote:Also, about those sub 2:40 times, they are definitively possible on slicks. And maybe even on sports with some tweaking.


"Some" tweaking.

Some.


Yeah, you know, actually, I'm not putting in the time to find that sub 2:40 on sports tyres LOL. The part that bothers me the most is the (very fair) maximum power:weight ratio, because that's usually where I get my advantage from :lol: As it is, I think given the time I have for this, I'm going to settle for getting points by being competitive to begin with, because no matter how little time I spent on the 1945 build, it's still not a great feeling to always be stuck in the no-points zone!
<<

BlastersPewPew

Posts: 628

Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:01 am

Cars: Mazda 3

Post Tue May 12, 2015 5:21 am

Re: BRC 1955 - The Golden Age [BUILD]

strop wrote:it's still not a great feeling to always be stuck in the no-points zone!


But I need company!!!!! Dont leave me alone!!!!!! :P
PreviousNext

Return to Community Challenges & Competitions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests