Re: Exploration vehicle challenge (now open!)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Image](http://shrani.si/f/12/11A/23zmFDSm/amwec--small1.png)
Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand.
Posts: 653
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:50 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Cars: Not the 2011 Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet in the photo.
Naturally Aspirated
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 5:47 am
Location: 'Murica
Cars: My Chevy Cavalier is gone. I am Carless.
Turbocharged
Posts: 365
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:26 pm
Cars: 13 Nissan Pathfinder
99 Nissan Frontier
84 Jeep CJ7 (rock crawler)
DoctorNarfy wrote:Ladies and Gents, I give you, The Shromet Pioneer!
Powered By (Wait for this one) An 8.4 Liter V12. De-Tuned to perfection. Redline on this car, 4000RPM. A Single Carburetor to optimize fuel efficiency and reliability.
koolkei wrote:
uuh buddy?
4.7km/l is 11.05MPG. it's already in double digits
Naturally Aspirated
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 5:47 am
Location: 'Murica
Cars: My Chevy Cavalier is gone. I am Carless.
Posts: 653
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:50 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Cars: Not the 2011 Porsche 911 Turbo Cabriolet in the photo.
squidhead wrote:20 grand a car, there's my problem. Anything I do ends up over budget.
thecarlover wrote:(assuming you're just a few hundred off)
DoctorNarfy wrote:Yeah, Mechanical fuel injection is better as far as horsepower output, but in my opinion, it's not worth the price gap. I've found a way to use carburetor to get pretty darn good reliability, but in the process, I think I've won the award for lowest specific output. 8 liters of thundering fury, developing... Wait for it....
110 Horsepower.
Naturally Aspirated
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun May 24, 2015 5:47 am
Location: 'Murica
Cars: My Chevy Cavalier is gone. I am Carless.
cpufreak101 wrote:DoctorNarfy wrote:Yeah, Mechanical fuel injection is better as far as horsepower output, but in my opinion, it's not worth the price gap. I've found a way to use carburetor to get pretty darn good reliability, but in the process, I think I've won the award for lowest specific output. 8 liters of thundering fury, developing... Wait for it....
110 Horsepower.
sorry i just found my one engine i made, 10.8 liters of turbocharged V8 (yes knock free) producing...
3.3HP
DoctorNarfy wrote:cpufreak101 wrote:DoctorNarfy wrote:Yeah, Mechanical fuel injection is better as far as horsepower output, but in my opinion, it's not worth the price gap. I've found a way to use carburetor to get pretty darn good reliability, but in the process, I think I've won the award for lowest specific output. 8 liters of thundering fury, developing... Wait for it....
110 Horsepower.
sorry i just found my one engine i made, 10.8 liters of turbocharged V8 (yes knock free) producing...
3.3HP
I gotta know this one, was it just a personal goal to find the lowest horsepower without knocking or something?
Return to Community Challenges & Competitions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests