
23 Star Beta Tester
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:51 am
Location: Ludwigshafen/Germany
Cars: Alfa Romeo 159 1.9JTS
Opel Vivaro 2.0CDTI SE
23 Star Beta Tester
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:51 am
Location: Ludwigshafen/Germany
Cars: Alfa Romeo 159 1.9JTS
Opel Vivaro 2.0CDTI SE
4-Star Beta Tester
Posts: 674
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:11 pm
Location: Halifax, UK
Cars: Alfa Romeo Giulietta Sportiva
Kubboz wrote:What does not make sense to me is that you are for some reason not counting cargo space as the part of utility. There is a reason utility is not that much of a factor in compact class - while it is nice to have some cargo space and load capacity, cheaper bodies (and having a small body, as in not a longer estate, but a shorter hatchback, definitely helps) are the way to go. This is also the reason why main factor for transport is utility and why a station wagon would have more of it.
15-Star Beta Tester
Posts: 1344
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:34 am
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Cars: Seat Ibiza 6L 1.4
Der Bayer wrote:Both of you are right. Volume per footprint is what counts for utility.
Naturally Aspirated
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:41 am
Location: Slovakia, EU
Cars: Hyundai Accent 1.4 71kW/97hp
PMP1337 wrote:Der Bayer wrote:Both of you are right. Volume per footprint is what counts for utility.
Now I get it.
What will be the number of buyers for each class?
Supercharged
Posts: 2104
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 8:25 am
Location: United States of America
Cars: 1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT SL,
1994 Mercedes-Benz S600
Der Bayer wrote:These are the target groups (the number of people in each groups scales with the number of participants, but the share in percent will stay the same).
Jakgoe wrote:No, this:Der Bayer wrote:These are the target groups (the number of people in each groups scales with the number of participants, but the share in percent will stay the same).
Jakgoe wrote:No, this:Der Bayer wrote:These are the target groups (the number of people in each groups scales with the number of participants, but the share in percent will stay the same).
PMP1337 wrote:I asked because I'm having trouble with breaking even for the market share I am expecting. On the test almost everyone priced their cars too cheap.
And on this one there will be even more entries.
5-Star Beta Tester
Posts: 1297
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:24 am
Cars: Skoda Felicia Combi 1.3 MPi LXi
Reaper392 wrote:PMP1337 wrote:I asked because I'm having trouble with breaking even for the market share I am expecting. On the test almost everyone priced their cars too cheap.
And on this one there will be even more entries.
Was your car Test_Cheapo_Sportscar? ( If it was then don't be too disheartened. I tried several cars in that last test and the only serious entry not to make a profit was the cheap sports car (well, it was aimed at the track day market but that's close enough). It was priced at almost double your car's cost despite having significantly less factory, material and production costs. The graph shows that it is another cheap sports car that just couldn't make a profit no matter what price it was set at.
One piece of advice we can both take from that test is that both our factories were way too big. Mine could cope with 100000 cars and yours could cope with ~175000 cars, yet we both only sold around 25000 cars. Smaller factories would have saved us both a lot of money which could possibly have given us a bit of profit, but it appears that this market was quite hard to make a profit in with those target group values.
Obviously if that isn't your car then this post wont help you much
Reaper392 wrote:I guess my advice didn't help much then
PMP, if you let me know which cars were yours I'll give you what advice I can.
Return to Community Challenges & Competitions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests