automationgame.com

Posted: **Sun Apr 26, 2015 5:53 pm**

Development of the Chlumsky F1.

1991 Le Mans:
Pole Position - #1 Team Sauber Mercedes - 3:31.270
Fastest Lap - #31 Team Sauber Mercedes - 3:35.564
Chlumsky F1C3 - 3:28.02 1566 HP 195mm Tires

Chlumsky F1C32 B1 3:22:64 1586 HP 295mm Tires

Posted: **Sun Apr 26, 2015 6:54 pm**

You can:
-Add bigger tyres
-Reduce turbo lag
-Reduce fuel usage
-Improve reliability
-Reduce sliders usage
-Reduce total cost

Take a look at my Dracula for reference.

Posted: **Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:15 pm**

What he said. The engine is a time bomb and the tires have less contact patch than your average econobox. Needs far more optimization.

Posted: **Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:57 pm**

What the frikkin f**k...
This engine works for more than 60 metres of driving?

Posted: **Sun Apr 26, 2015 8:33 pm**

The F1C2C Engine Detuned for higher reliability.

The new engine now allows for better fuel economy as well. 20.8 Miles per gallon rather than a 5.7 MPG rating with the 1586 HP Engine.

Posted: **Sun Apr 26, 2015 8:59 pm**

chlumsky wrote:
The F1C2C Engine Detuned for higher reliability.

The new engine now allows for better fuel economy as well. 20.8 Miles per gallon rather than a 5.7 MPG rating with the 1586 HP Engine.

I see what you did there satanist

Posted: **Sun Apr 26, 2015 9:19 pm**

Chlumsky F1C3B3 Sport- 530 HP - 98 OCTANE - FR LAYOUT - Street compound road tires - 31.1 Miles Per Gallon - 2255 lbs - Corners 820" 3' 2g - Vmax=173.2 MPH 279 Kilometers p/h
Drive for miles and miles without a fillup, service intervals lengthened!

Posted: **Mon Apr 27, 2015 3:05 am**

You are getting there, if only you could do something about the cost!

Posted: **Mon Apr 27, 2015 12:41 pm**

A Type R concept was thought of but was scrapped.

Posted: **Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:08 pm**

4.7 Engine tuned with less turbo lag in mind, runs on 91 octane gas, 700 hp 635 ft lbs torque. (521 kW, 861 Nm)
In the United States, normally the highest fuel octane rating is 93, with some places only have 92 (me), and others 91.

Posted: **Mon Apr 27, 2015 1:37 pm**

Nice power curve, you're getting better. Your pistons and connecting rods are still yellow and impacting your reliability, though. Everything except the turbo should be green. Try reducing the stroke or improving the quality of the bottom end.

Posted: **Mon Apr 27, 2015 2:16 pm**

Thanks for the feedback. Increased Reliability. 719 hp, 719 Ft lbs torque (536 kW, 975 Nm)

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2015 3:03 am**

chlumsky wrote:Thanks for the feedback. Increased Reliability. 719 hp, 719 Ft lbs torque (536 kW, 975 Nm)

Lol, these turbos are burning just like in early engine for Airborne Cerberus.

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2015 6:47 am**

Oskiinus wrote:Lol, these turbos are burning just like in early engine for Airborne Cerberus.

Don't listen to this guy, the turbos aren't "burning". The red just means they're restrictive at high RPM, which is a necessary trade off if you want them to spool at mid to low RPM. Any engine with green turbos is going to have massive turbo lag and a useless power band.

Posted: **Tue Apr 28, 2015 7:38 am**

oppositelock wrote:
Oskiinus wrote:Lol, these turbos are burning just like in early engine for Airborne Cerberus.

Don't listen to this guy, the turbos aren't "burning". The red just means they're restrictive at high RPM, which is a necessary trade off if you want them to spool at mid to low RPM. Any engine with green turbos is going to have massive turbo lag and a useless power band.

Lol, I can't insert a joke about air cooling.

automationgame.com

Chlumsky Corp.

Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.

Re: Chlumsky Corp.