Fussel Engineering Startup 1970

[KillaGT]

ok thanks for your honest feedback,

The Skoyo yeah i admit it was just a bit of bunching what may not was made to fit together, i promise i will do better when there will be made a V2 out of it

i will now concentrate on the Hayga Versions to continue right here and show you all the diffrent evolution line's through the individual V Series (it will go on till V5 - a higher one has not been created until yet) - lets begin with the Hayga V2 - well, it's called V2 R cause it fit's the 450HP V8 that also is implemented in the Stream's - the complete front is filled engine area, but a car this size that need's ~11l /100KM may not be what the market is asking for - but check out the design:

I played a little with the tail lights, these are the brighter one's. - on the V3 there will be smaller compact tail lights that in my opinion may fit better The Taillights from the V1 i admit are to modern in this area mid 90's

The Front and Backend i tried to create sporty, i hope it will somehow meet your demands in style but i'm open for improvements

Have a look at the V2 R and feel free to criticize all you want ----------

[WizzyThaMan]

Ok, you want honest criticism, thats what you will get I'm going to be a bitch about things and small details Note that it is my opinion, so you dont necesarrilly have to agree with me.

Front
First, I like what you did with the headlights in the bottom to act like foglights. The idea is pretty good, but might need a little retouch, nevertheless I wouldnt complain if it was like that on the car if I was to buy it.
The headlights, grill, badge position looks good. It gives it a a bit unique look. I like the small vents on the side of the front bumper.

Side
The doorhandles seem to be a bit low-ish. I would place them up a bit more... It now looks like (especially rear door) that I have to reach pretty far down to open it.
The wheel arches flared out looks a bit silly when looking from different angles, but thats actually a good thing. Looks quite sporty, and its necesarry to fit big tires to get all that horsepower to the asphalt.

Back
I like the fat-ass it's got. The twin exhausts arent too small or too big, just right. Though, the headlights look good in their spot, but the big badge seems to disrupt the 'balance' on the rear. Maybe leave the badge out, or make it smaller and in between the taillights. By the way, Where will the licenseplate be?
Its a good thing you placed those lights a bit down. if they were up more,(me imagining it) this angle gives me a really Volvo 340 feeling, and I dont think you want that with this car.

I would say its a nice and decent 8.2/10. Not the prettiest, but certain details look quite good and the engine makes up A LOT

[KillaGT]

aww damn, you got me with the licenceplate i haven't thought about it on this modell put it between the exhausts will crush the complete style of the rear - even in the front it would be difficult to place one of the europeon bright plate's, that's deffinately a point for you.

the door handle's may be the wrong ones, i already had a look at the side when they we're playced higher it looks strange, too but i can move them more aside on the rear doors

thanks for your feedback so far

[KillaGT]

ok i will now continue with the V3 - it will have the same stupid doorhandle's in the same position, cause the screenshot was taken right after the V2 The V3 is a more common, not that agressive looking but still sporty Version with a 1.5l 150HP 4Zyl Turbo engine. It's also really light ~1100KG so the engine is capable to achieve good results in fuel-usage/economy

The Back now has the smaller Taillights and there's also space for the licence plate

Have a look:

[TheTom]

Overall i think the V3 looks better than the V2. I like the rear end much better because i think the taillights on the V2 were too big. I personally don't like the front upper grille because i don't like this particular shape in general, not your fault there :p but apart from that i like it what year is this car built in?

[KillaGT]

it's from the mid 90's - 1995 is the year of the engine, but the chassis were developed with material from the mid 80's. The Hayga at all laid 10years in the tray cause the shape was to modern to release it in the 80's

The V3 also has a slight engine upgrade the V3 S comes up with the same engine pushed to 200HP but it's not that efficient in this stage, also the driving results are not that mentionable to pronounce a major update.

[WizzyThaMan]

Now that looks amazing Much better!

[Jakgoe]

That does look like a huge improvement. In this revision, the front is very able to share some design elements with the back, and it makes the overall look much smoother.

[KillaGT]

thanks for that

i made the V4 a bit more common, instead of the V3 it looks boring (of the rod), but it's a cheaper version, cheaper materials, and a little bit heavier than the V3 - nearly the same results in economy and driving, same 1.5l Tubo engine.

also i tried to fit a little wing at the back, but it's more than less nothing more than a tryout - i don't really like the wing it looks displaced but there's no chance to bevel it better ^^

Here's the V4 it also has a Shape diffretn from the other one's - it looks more like a wagon.

[WizzyThaMan]

the chrome vents in the front and the spoiler in the back are too much for me. I like the V3 much better.

[KillaGT]

ok, now back to the roots, a little diffrent design in Front & Back, here is the V5 =)

[WizzyThaMan]

The front gives me an american ford idea

[Noporian]

The front reminds me of the Cita Chiquera.

Chiquera 2014-1.png (793.31 KiB) Viewed 5076 times

[Jakgoe]

The headlights seem way to big for the car. Otherwise, I think it is great!

[KillaGT]

well i was not trying to do some plagiarism - haven't seen the Cita Chiquera befor

So with the V5 the official story of the Hayga is done but i created an inoffical V6 that when you have a look at the side, has a coupe touch with a little outcomming back. Not evryone's favorite i guess, but i tried to give the V6 also a sporty touch. I also used a old 2.6l 150HP 4Zyl non Turbo engine, to get some differences shown in efficiency / fuel usage between turbo's & non tubo's - The engine is Using technique from mid 80's so it's not typicall for this car

Here are the pics