Nice engines you got there body, a L4 with almost 100hp per liter without DFI or turbo, nice.
However, I have a few sugestions that you may take into consideration for future engines.
Your engines are making power at the redline, which is not a good thing. It means your rev limiter is cuting your power, it hurts the performance index, and as you can see, must engines actually produce the power way before the rev limit, that's because when you change gears (from 2nd to 3rd for example) the engine would have to rev a lot to get into the maximum power, only to stay there very briefly (how many times we hit the rev limiter when driving?).
Also you want an engine with a
wide torque curve, you also want to get peak torque very early and the peak power high in the revs, a wide
powerband. If you see your economy graph, your engines are
only efficient at higher rpms, and unless you match the engine with a close gear ratio transmission with a lots of speeds, you'll ended up with a
poor fuel economy rating because your engine is not efficient at cruise speeds (1,500-2,500 rpms). Top torque around 4,500 rpms is
good for a 90s car, however in 2016 we'll loking into cars that hit peak torque around 2,000-3,000 rpms.
Also consider that the shape of the torque curve affects the
sportiness and
comfort stats, a nice flat curve is better for comfort and a curve with a
bump is good for sportiness.
Finally, your turbo engine spools really really late, 4,800 rpms, (it only produces around 100 hp from idle to 3,000 rpms), and stays in power for a little moment, which
can be ok for a racing engine, but for a street car it can be quite a pain to drive (it takes a lot to accelerate and then it hits you in the face... for a few moments, but again, how many times do we even rev above 4,000 rpms?).
Again, these are only suggestions, but you can make your engines as original as you want them to be
cheers.