Page 1 of 1

Gaupa 2.0L Diesel Engine like performance eco, With car body

PostPosted: Sun Aug 25, 2013 10:40 am
by xphraze1989
This is my 2.0L Eco engine, High torque, With a Diesel engine like design, With a 108,4mm stroke and a 76mm bore, with a low Redline cuz or else the MTBF would be to low cuz the conrods and pistons would fail fast.

I name it the "Gaupa 2.0 GLST" that i thing would have suited in the "Gaupa E2" car body

What do you guys think ?

Engine.jpg
Engine.jpg (368.49 KiB) Viewed 3023 times


Car -3.png
Car -3.png (1009.44 KiB) Viewed 3023 times

Re: Gaupa 2.0L Diesel Engine like performance eco, With car

PostPosted: Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:18 am
by deanwells1234
I like the engine but why are you putting a high torque low HP engine in a car? wouldnt you want a high HP in that car to give it some get up and go?

Re: Gaupa 2.0L Diesel Engine like performance eco, With car

PostPosted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 2:32 am
by xphraze1989
deanwells1234 wrote:I like the engine but why are you putting a high torque low HP engine in a car? wouldnt you want a high HP in that car to give it some get up and go?


with shorter RPM range and a longer range on the girbox there is less difference in RPM between different speeds.
allows you to keep you on the most economical RPM for a longer range of speed.
lets just say that this engine is most economical between 60kmt and 120kmt instead of high rpm
engines that you are only the most economically between 80 and 100kmt. its my theory = )
Take a look at the g/kWh graph

AND if u let go of the accelerator when going downhill, the car engine will not slow the car as much, which is also economically

Re: Gaupa 2.0L Diesel Engine like performance eco, With car

PostPosted: Sat Aug 31, 2013 4:33 am
by deanwells1234
with shorter RPM range and a longer range on the girbox there is less difference in RPM between different speeds. allows you to keep you on the most economical RPM for a longer range of speed. lets just say that this engine is most economical between 60kmt and 120kmt instead of high rpm engines that you are only the most economically between 80 and 100kmt. its my theory = )Take a look at the g/kWh graphAND if u let go of the accelerator when going downhill, the car engine will not slow the car as much, which is also economically


That makes sense I just always thought you would want to put the high rpm engines in to these cars so that people can rev them high and acclerate quickly... maybe make two options on the car one for economy o e for pure power