Chassis Quality
EDIT: for example, the car I am working on costs $9179.10 and 117.96 P.U. at 0 quality, at +5 it is $9992.52 & 133.13 P.U., at -5 it is $9942.95 & 116.35 P.U.
4-Star Beta Tester
Posts: 1270
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 6:59 am
Location: Curitiba, Brazil
Cars: '15 Ford Ka 1.0 SE
BlastersPewPew wrote:The problem with that is the production units dont decrease enough to make it worth it, they only went down by about 1.5 units, I was expecting a similar drop like the +5 got in a boost.
PMP1337 wrote:BlastersPewPew wrote:The problem with that is the production units dont decrease enough to make it worth it, they only went down by about 1.5 units, I was expecting a similar drop like the +5 got in a boost.
Someone will come here and say: "The quality slider represents tech year, so using tech year from five years ago isn't the same as traveling to the future as it happens when you up the slider."
I've told this many times. Quality sliders should be about quality. Tech year free points don't make sense. Either you have the tecnology or don't. Ok, you want to give free quality boost to companies that have expertise on certain tech, sure, but don't claim "tech year". Claim something like pratical research bonus or something.
Quality sliders should represent the better tolerances, the higher quality control.
Lowering the sliders to have less production units should be a viable option. Because brands do that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests