Supercharged
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:53 pm
Cars: 1991 Chevrolet Kadett
2011 Toyota Hilux
2013 Honda CG 150 Titan
Supercharged
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:53 pm
Cars: 1991 Chevrolet Kadett
2011 Toyota Hilux
2013 Honda CG 150 Titan
Supercharged
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:53 pm
Cars: 1991 Chevrolet Kadett
2011 Toyota Hilux
2013 Honda CG 150 Titan
Supercharged
Posts: 640
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:35 am
Location: Sweden
Cars: Opel Astra -99 1.6 16
Supercharged
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:53 pm
Cars: 1991 Chevrolet Kadett
2011 Toyota Hilux
2013 Honda CG 150 Titan
Supercharged
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:53 pm
Cars: 1991 Chevrolet Kadett
2011 Toyota Hilux
2013 Honda CG 150 Titan
Supercharged
Posts: 1983
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:07 pm
Location: Northeast USA
Cars: 2006 Scion Xb
Supercharged
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:53 pm
Cars: 1991 Chevrolet Kadett
2011 Toyota Hilux
2013 Honda CG 150 Titan
2-Star Beta Tester
Posts: 877
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Montreal, Canadia
Cars: 2006 Suzuki Swift+
fabiomarca wrote:lol thats exactly what i do, the first thing is set the compression all the way down and work over the cam profile, spark timing and AFR, my idea is always to keep the AFR 15:1 and advance the spark timing as high as possible, thats when the low compression would be useful.. lets say for example, in the worst case possible.. trying to run an engine made in 1960, with the biggest bore possible, push rod header, and only 1 single barrel carb, all that with 80 gas.. such engine would need to run with 0 spark advance, 13,4:1 of AFR and then maybe with a 80'ish cam profile(that is totally not efficient in a wide bore engine), in those conditions it would run.. poorly, but still it would not auto destruct on the first start.. but then, just by having lower compression ratios all this situation could be avoided, giving the engine more power, efficiency, response and it would not look like a steam train with all the smoke.. lol
23 Star Beta Tester
Posts: 816
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:51 am
Location: Ludwigshafen/Germany
Cars: Alfa Romeo 159 1.9JTS
Opel Vivaro 2.0CDTI SE
fabiomarca wrote:I'm not sure if I'm the only one thinking about that but how about compression ratio start at 2:1 instead of 6:1 ?? It would be more easy to make an old/early-day engine without having to flood it with fuel, using extreme cam profiles and almost dead timings for ignition.. not a big request I believe, hope it can be taken into the game someday.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests