FAQ  •  Login

Rod to Stroke Ratio

<<

Leafy

User avatar

Silver Supporter
Silver Supporter

Posts: 59

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:39 am

Location: Worcester, MA

Cars: 1994 Miata R-Package

Post Mon Aug 15, 2011 12:25 pm

Rod to Stroke Ratio

It would be nice to see the option of rod length in the engine builder since rod to stroke ratio can have a decent effect on engine dynamics. For example you could have 2 engines that are identical except one has very short rods, the short rod'ed engine would just run out of steam on the top end while the long rod engine would be able to keep on chugging up there. Just a thought of something to add.
WPI Class '12 ME
WPI SAE Risk and Sustainability Officer
WPI Motorsports Secretary
2002 Chevy Cavalier 5 spd MP62 SC with 2.8 pulley.

Automatics are for women and the disabled, they don't call it a MANual for nothing.
<<

dread_darven

User avatar

Official Tester
Official Tester

Posts: 93

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:18 am

Location: Meppel, The Netherlands

Cars: Honda Civic EG with B18C6 Type-R engine
Opel Vectra daily

Post Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:36 pm

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

I dont think it is needed and also think it wont be included. you have bore/stroke and compression you can play around with already. It would be to much information for people with not alot of experience with engines, its just recently that i even got it :P
<<

Daffyflyer

User avatar

Developer - Lead Artist
Developer - Lead Artist

Posts: 3444

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:36 pm

Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Cars: 1993 Mazda Lantis Type R V6 Racecar, 2006 BMW 530i

Post Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:46 pm

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

I know that in reality its quite important, but for our use, long stroke-short stroke is enough!
3d Artist, Game Designer, Marketing Guy

Follow us on
Twitter - http://twitter.com/AutomationGame
ModDB - http://www.moddb.com/games/automation
Facebook - http://goo.gl/omJzt
Chat http://automationgame.com/irc
<<

dread_darven

User avatar

Official Tester
Official Tester

Posts: 93

Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:18 am

Location: Meppel, The Netherlands

Cars: Honda Civic EG with B18C6 Type-R engine
Opel Vectra daily

Post Wed Aug 17, 2011 2:59 am

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

And the stroke bore ratio already impacts the max rpm.... (if im not mistaken)
<<

Daffyflyer

User avatar

Developer - Lead Artist
Developer - Lead Artist

Posts: 3444

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:36 pm

Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Cars: 1993 Mazda Lantis Type R V6 Racecar, 2006 BMW 530i

Post Wed Aug 17, 2011 3:03 am

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

Well, the total amount of stroke does, the more stroke the faster the piston has to travel at a given RPM, and there is a limit to how fast your pistons can go before something breaks :)
3d Artist, Game Designer, Marketing Guy

Follow us on
Twitter - http://twitter.com/AutomationGame
ModDB - http://www.moddb.com/games/automation
Facebook - http://goo.gl/omJzt
Chat http://automationgame.com/irc
<<

Leafy

User avatar

Silver Supporter
Silver Supporter

Posts: 59

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:39 am

Location: Worcester, MA

Cars: 1994 Miata R-Package

Post Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:28 am

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

Yes that. I didnt figure you guys would be able to add it the more I think about it. Not many, if any, engine models include.
WPI Class '12 ME
WPI SAE Risk and Sustainability Officer
WPI Motorsports Secretary
2002 Chevy Cavalier 5 spd MP62 SC with 2.8 pulley.

Automatics are for women and the disabled, they don't call it a MANual for nothing.
<<

loady740

Silver Supporter
Silver Supporter

Posts: 314

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 1:01 pm

Cars: 1985 Dodge W150
1999 Dodge Dakota Sport 3.9 V6 Magnum,5spd

Post Sun Aug 21, 2011 4:20 pm

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

isnt it the length of the rods that determines the stroke anyways?

for example.... longer connection rods = longer stroke

and shorter connection rods = shorter stroke


and here is a similar question when adjusting stroke in the engine designer isnt that basically making the connection rods longer ?
LJZ Cars
Company ID: 201022
<<

T16

User avatar

8-Star Beta Tester
8-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 468

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 1:49 pm

Location: Denmark

Cars: AW11, 405 T16

Post Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:34 pm

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

No the stroke is determined by the crankshaft throw ( the distance between the axis off where the con-rods connects and the axis of the crankshaft)
<<

Daffyflyer

User avatar

Developer - Lead Artist
Developer - Lead Artist

Posts: 3444

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:36 pm

Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Cars: 1993 Mazda Lantis Type R V6 Racecar, 2006 BMW 530i

Post Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:37 pm

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

Yup
3d Artist, Game Designer, Marketing Guy

Follow us on
Twitter - http://twitter.com/AutomationGame
ModDB - http://www.moddb.com/games/automation
Facebook - http://goo.gl/omJzt
Chat http://automationgame.com/irc
<<

Leafy

User avatar

Silver Supporter
Silver Supporter

Posts: 59

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:39 am

Location: Worcester, MA

Cars: 1994 Miata R-Package

Post Mon Aug 22, 2011 1:30 am

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

And longer stroke typically means shorter rods. Because stroke + rod length + piston height (distance between the wrist pin and the top of the piston) need to be equal to or less than the deck height of the engine (distance between center of the crank and the top of the block). Well unless you have the weirdest designed head ever that actually has room for the piston to go into the head. Also increasing rod length does not increase compression.
WPI Class '12 ME
WPI SAE Risk and Sustainability Officer
WPI Motorsports Secretary
2002 Chevy Cavalier 5 spd MP62 SC with 2.8 pulley.

Automatics are for women and the disabled, they don't call it a MANual for nothing.
<<

loady740

Silver Supporter
Silver Supporter

Posts: 314

Joined: Fri May 06, 2011 1:01 pm

Cars: 1985 Dodge W150
1999 Dodge Dakota Sport 3.9 V6 Magnum,5spd

Post Mon Aug 22, 2011 2:29 am

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

Leafy wrote:And longer stroke typically means shorter rods. Because stroke + rod length + piston height (distance between the wrist pin and the top of the piston) need to be equal to or less than the deck height of the engine (distance between center of the crank and the top of the block). Well unless you have the weirdest designed head ever that actually has room for the piston to go into the head. Also increasing rod length does not increase compression.



i see
LJZ Cars
Company ID: 201022
<<

house2137

Posts: 4

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2011 9:44 am

Cars: ...
+ '77 IH Scout II, 304cid
+ '95 Buick Regal Coupe GS, 3.8L

Post Sun Sep 04, 2011 10:31 am

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

let me write you a story (please bear with me... :mrgreen: )

rod ratio really has nothing to do with stroke length. it might be necessary to change rod ratio due to a long stroke (to get more of the lower, rotating end of the rod out of the bore for clearance) but rod ratio is basically a number dependent on the manufactured deck height and wrist pin height, considering stroke as a constant for a sec.

placing a feature in-game to alter deck height (cylinder deck to crank CL) AND compression height (wrist pin CL to piston crown; general "piston size") would both be effective tools for adjusting rod ratio, which could always just be a stat that gets pumped out by the simulating side of the game. obviously using different pistons would require that the deck height be reset to maintain a previously set stroke length. let me list a few supporting reasons for adjustable deck height/rod ratio:

  • the ability to specify a short rod engine would be intensely beneficial in short-stroke, high-RPM engines. this would increase the amount of available peak torque due to a better relationship between rod and crank throw as power is delivered through the "levers" that are these two items.
  • being able to adjust this ratio ultimately determines how much mechanical stress the engine sees through each impulse of power, and will logically work for contributing to a reliability factor in the game. generally long rod engines see less stress at the rod journal and experience less eccentric wear on the mains, while sacrificing a bit of peak torque and gaining a heavier internal "hybrid" mass.
  • the ability to incorrectly adjust the rod ratio is just one factor* than can contribute to an unsuccessful engine, and since the development is intended to be infinite... this will play a major part in the "difficulty" aspect of the game. if you make a poor engine, i would assume it might not sell as well.
  • piston acceleration out of intake-stroke TDC plays a HUGE part in determining how the valve acceleration and port shape/intake work together to create effective inflow. the effect of a minimum-length vs. maximum-length rod in a long-stroke (undersquare) engine will accelerate the piston out of its TDC position earlier and simulate the same effect that increasing RPM will have on witnessed flow, and thus performance. by this same token, a short-stroke engine with longer rods will (dependent on the exhaust system) have a slightly longer hesitation period at BDC before the exhaust stroke, and this will allow expanding gasses a fractionally larger period of time in which to escape through an already-open exhaust valve and reduce pumping losses/increase scavenging effect (up to a point) without altering bore-to-stroke.


if you still believe rod ratio is an unimportant factor, it might be beneficial to spend a few hours researching the topic. it basically amounts to utilizing adaptive-fit cylinder blocks/sleeves, coolant passages, and belts/pushrods that will automatically resize when given the command to increase deck height - and this is obviously independent of stroke length, i.e. the respective positions of the piston must move with the same offset that the deck uses. i am sure a feature to identify clearance issues and prevent adjustments resulting in interference can be included as well.

to anyone saying this relationship isn't realistic, go ahead and compare the rod ratios of many different engines (obviously you need to look outside of one class of engine) and see how they differ. wholly dependent on application, rod ratio can hurt or help the situation. i'm hoping the game isn't JUST cars... but that's all for the future.

it goes without saying that this will also affect packaging of the engine, and allow the user to create a much wider array of performance values for the same given bore, stroke, and number of cylinders. in reality, this is just another dimension that is seriously considered when designing an engine.




i apologize for saying this when one of the developers has already said it flies in the face of their intentions, but i am hoping it is a convincing argument when considering long-term future developments. you said you wanted a "techie" game, well here's how the techies might want it. IMHO.

oh, and since this is my first post.... awesome game! you guys really hit the nail on the head when it comes to gearhead gaming. so thanks for investing so much time and money, i will not forget the title.

- kyle


*also involved in the reliability argument is an addition to adjustable rod ratio: adjustable compression height of the piston, and primarily their overall physical dimensions. some designs do indeed lend themselves to higher out-of-round wear in the thrust direction, and more rocking of the piston perpendicular to thrust. this presents even another factor to use when calculating reliability.
<<

Leafy

User avatar

Silver Supporter
Silver Supporter

Posts: 59

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:39 am

Location: Worcester, MA

Cars: 1994 Miata R-Package

Post Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:01 pm

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

pst, you want a long rod high reving engine. So that you get better peak torque from better leverage on the crank, and higher piston speeds at better leverage angles, and higher piston speeds later for more open intake valves on the intake stroke.
WPI Class '12 ME
WPI SAE Risk and Sustainability Officer
WPI Motorsports Secretary
2002 Chevy Cavalier 5 spd MP62 SC with 2.8 pulley.

Automatics are for women and the disabled, they don't call it a MANual for nothing.
<<

JeffreyCor

1-Star Beta Tester
1-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 204

Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 4:59 pm

Location: Homeland, CA

Cars: 1986 Chrysler LeBaron
1999 Saturn SL2

Post Sun Sep 04, 2011 12:16 pm

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

Leafy wrote:pst, you want a long rod ...

:mrgreen: Who doesn't? I couldn't resist! :lol:
<<

Daffyflyer

User avatar

Developer - Lead Artist
Developer - Lead Artist

Posts: 3444

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:36 pm

Location: Wellington, New Zealand

Cars: 1993 Mazda Lantis Type R V6 Racecar, 2006 BMW 530i

Post Sun Sep 04, 2011 1:10 pm

Re: Rod to Stroke Ratio

I won't argue that its not a key factor in real world engine design, but we do need to stop somewhere with detail unfortunately as we do need to actually FINISH this game.
3d Artist, Game Designer, Marketing Guy

Follow us on
Twitter - http://twitter.com/AutomationGame
ModDB - http://www.moddb.com/games/automation
Facebook - http://goo.gl/omJzt
Chat http://automationgame.com/irc
Next

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests