FAQ  •  Login

Direct Injection Cost and Ignition Timing

<<

nerd

User avatar

Posts: 228

Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 12:53 pm

Location: USA

Cars: None as of now and at least 3 years from now.

Post Sun Apr 12, 2015 3:20 pm

Re: Direct Injection Cost and Ignition Timing

Killrob wrote:Adding systems that automatically adjust ignition timing and such are an interesting thought. For the most part I agree with the fuel choice comments too, apart from the choice of leaded vs. unleaded and the important effect of that on emissions / regulations / game progression in general.


Could you perhaps implement an option called "Engine Knock Protection"
Obviously it would make not much sense in Sandbox but could improve your image because a customer would not throw a fit because your engine does not run properly on 91 RON because it's designed to run on 95 RON.
To see an idea in sandbox, clicking "Engine Knock Protection" on an engine with an octane rating of say, 93.3, and then clicking 91 RON would detune the engine by way of compression until it is below or equal to 91.0.
Unclicking it would cause knocking on 91 RON.
Rado Automotive Incrorporated (my automation car company): 1946998
Rado Automotive Incorporated car showroom
<<

Drake

User avatar

Turbocharged
Turbocharged

Posts: 347

Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:41 am

Location: Birdland

Cars: 1986 Ford F-250 Diesel, 1971 Datsun 240Z, 2002 Saab 9-3 SE

Post Mon Apr 13, 2015 7:26 am

Re: Direct Injection Cost and Ignition Timing

nerd wrote:
Killrob wrote:Adding systems that automatically adjust ignition timing and such are an interesting thought. For the most part I agree with the fuel choice comments too, apart from the choice of leaded vs. unleaded and the important effect of that on emissions / regulations / game progression in general.


Could you perhaps implement an option called "Engine Knock Protection"
Obviously it would make not much sense in Sandbox but could improve your image because a customer would not throw a fit because your engine does not run properly on 91 RON because it's designed to run on 95 RON.
To see an idea in sandbox, clicking "Engine Knock Protection" on an engine with an octane rating of say, 93.3, and then clicking 91 RON would detune the engine by way of compression until it is below or equal to 91.0.
Unclicking it would cause knocking on 91 RON.


You can't detune the compression on an engine though, so that doesn't really make sense.. (unless you're talking about the Saab variable compression engine which never went into production... but thats a whole other crazy thing)

This would make sense if you had some sort of ECU or engine management tech. Then it could detune the engine by way of retart ignition timing as real cars do when running on poor octane fuel.. Some cars such as the first gen MR2s had a switch that would adjust the timing based on fuel quality as well.
<<

flip7144

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 3

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2014 2:59 am

Cars: 2012 Mazda 3i

Post Mon Apr 13, 2015 3:05 pm

Re: Direct Injection Cost and Ignition Timing

Maybe any engine that's designed to take a higher octane gas than regular should be more expensive (and less expensive as the years go by) to show that there is anti-knock protection? I don't think that something like anti-knock protection is worth taking up space.
<<

Sayonara

User avatar

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 219

Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:19 am

Post Mon Apr 13, 2015 7:21 pm

Re: Direct Injection Cost and Ignition Timing

Intrud3r wrote:never saw ron indication on a porsche 911 or a ferrari


It's in the owner's manual.

I would be surprised if there was a car without a fuel spec in the owner's manual.
Image
<<

nerd

User avatar

Posts: 228

Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2015 12:53 pm

Location: USA

Cars: None as of now and at least 3 years from now.

Post Mon Apr 20, 2015 8:41 am

Re: Direct Injection Cost and Ignition Timing

Drake wrote:
nerd wrote:
Killrob wrote:Adding systems that automatically adjust ignition timing and such are an interesting thought. For the most part I agree with the fuel choice comments too, apart from the choice of leaded vs. unleaded and the important effect of that on emissions / regulations / game progression in general.


Could you perhaps implement an option called "Engine Knock Protection"
Obviously it would make not much sense in Sandbox but could improve your image because a customer would not throw a fit because your engine does not run properly on 91 RON because it's designed to run on 95 RON.
To see an idea in sandbox, clicking "Engine Knock Protection" on an engine with an octane rating of say, 93.3, and then clicking 91 RON would detune the engine by way of compression until it is below or equal to 91.0.
Unclicking it would cause knocking on 91 RON.


You can't detune the compression on an engine though, so that doesn't really make sense.. (unless you're talking about the Saab variable compression engine which never went into production... but thats a whole other crazy thing)

This would make sense if you had some sort of ECU or engine management tech. Then it could detune the engine by way of retart ignition timing as real cars do when running on poor octane fuel.. Some cars such as the first gen MR2s had a switch that would adjust the timing based on fuel quality as well.


There we go, Auto reduce Ignition timing is how modern anti-knock systems work, not Auto reduce compression.
Rado Automotive Incrorporated (my automation car company): 1946998
Rado Automotive Incorporated car showroom
Previous

Return to Suggestions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests