Silver Supporter
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Cars: '93 Audi S4 4.2 V8
Vans and hybrids?
And how thorough is the suspension part of the game?
Silver Supporter
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Cars: '93 Audi S4 4.2 V8
5-Star Beta Tester
Posts: 1297
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:24 am
Cars: Skoda Felicia Combi 1.3 MPi LXi
The chassis setup will be done from set templates, to which you can then change. Suspension will not be super technical. It will more be about how modern/expense you wish to spend on the car. Do you go from a leaf spring, to a coil spring. Better suspension = better ride. There will probably be an option where you can spend money/time to get your engineers to make the suspension better for that model of car, but no direct tweaking yourself.
You are free to run any sort of company you want, [...] even a company making Twin Turbo V12 Removalist Vans[...]
Silver Supporter
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Cars: '93 Audi S4 4.2 V8
Gold Supporter
Posts: 81
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 2:06 pm
Location: Long Beach, CA. USA
Cars: 2005 Nissan Altima 2.5
Turbocharged
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Birdland
Cars: 1986 Ford F-250 Diesel, 1971 Datsun 240Z, 2002 Saab 9-3 SE
Deus ex Machina wrote:solely electrical cars are crap IMO.
the energy doesnt come out of the plug, it comes from a power plant, and those are mostly driven by oil gas or nuclear reactions.
in germany a smart with that kind of engine produces 122g CO2/km at the power plant. with the normal diesel engine the smart emits 9x g CO2/km.....
Turbocharged
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Birdland
Cars: 1986 Ford F-250 Diesel, 1971 Datsun 240Z, 2002 Saab 9-3 SE
Deus ex Machina wrote:what is a good diesel engine?
go to the european sites of
Mercedes CDI is diesel
VW/Audi TDI
FIAT/Alfa/Lancia JTD
Ford TDCi
Opel CDTI
Silver Supporter
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Cars: '93 Audi S4 4.2 V8
Drake wrote:Deus ex Machina wrote:solely electrical cars are crap IMO.
the energy doesnt come out of the plug, it comes from a power plant, and those are mostly driven by oil gas or nuclear reactions.
in germany a smart with that kind of engine produces 122g CO2/km at the power plant. with the normal diesel engine the smart emits 9x g CO2/km.....
I agree.. Here in Canada we don't get alot of cars with good diesel engines since for some stupid reason they pass american emission standards.. Which really makes little sense when they produce less of most emssions.
I have a feeling the americans hold gas and diesel engines to the same emission standards instead of separate standards.
And then there are Hybrids.. What a waste of money. Why pay 2 times as much for a car that gets maybe 20% better fuel ecconomy?
People should learn how to drive better to save fuel, that has much more todo with it than what kind of car you drive. Top gear raced a Prius around a track as fast as it could go, and had a BMW M3 follow it, just trying to keep up and the M3 got better fuel ecconomy.
Plus Hybrids are more enviromentally damaging in their lifetime than a Land Rover Discovery.(seriously)
Watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKTOyiKLARk
Edit: and this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOvp69ln ... re=related
Turbocharged
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Birdland
Cars: 1986 Ford F-250 Diesel, 1971 Datsun 240Z, 2002 Saab 9-3 SE
ChristianHA wrote:Drake wrote:Deus ex Machina wrote:solely electrical cars are crap IMO.
the energy doesnt come out of the plug, it comes from a power plant, and those are mostly driven by oil gas or nuclear reactions.
in germany a smart with that kind of engine produces 122g CO2/km at the power plant. with the normal diesel engine the smart emits 9x g CO2/km.....
I agree.. Here in Canada we don't get alot of cars with good diesel engines since for some stupid reason they pass american emission standards.. Which really makes little sense when they produce less of most emssions.
I have a feeling the americans hold gas and diesel engines to the same emission standards instead of separate standards.
And then there are Hybrids.. What a waste of money. Why pay 2 times as much for a car that gets maybe 20% better fuel ecconomy?
People should learn how to drive better to save fuel, that has much more todo with it than what kind of car you drive. Top gear raced a Prius around a track as fast as it could go, and had a BMW M3 follow it, just trying to keep up and the M3 got better fuel ecconomy.
Plus Hybrids are more enviromentally damaging in their lifetime than a Land Rover Discovery.(seriously)
Watch this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKTOyiKLARk
Edit: and this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOvp69ln ... re=related
Actually, diesel engines are a lot more damaging to the environment than petrol engines, due to the high NOx emissions. Here in Norway, we really struggle at wintertime, because most of the cars sold today are diesels. In the big cities there's so much particulate matter asthmatics are having trouble being outside. This has never been a problem, until just a few years ago when the sale of dieselcars began taking off.
Silver Supporter
Posts: 57
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 11:48 pm
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Cars: '93 Audi S4 4.2 V8
Drake wrote:
Most new Diesel engines have Particulate filters that remove 85-100% of the particulates from the exhaust.
Aside from that Diesel engines will last twice as long or more than petrol engines. That means less cars have to be produced and less damage to the enviroment.
They may produce more NOx, but they produce almost no CO2 and get much better mileage. In the long run, Diesel is better for the enviroment.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests