Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
You have 2 number 1 spots in the OP
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
Might as well throw another production car into the mix.
Name of car: PAK Gold Standard 400-17
Intended use: EXTREME MUSCLE/Hypercar
Year: 2017
Power & Torque ratings: 1514hp @ 6900 rpm / 1693 nm @ 5100 rpm
Price (prod. cars only): $350K
Turbo or NA: Twin Turbo
Weight: 1575 kg
Format : F-AWD
"Hey, let's build a premium muscle car."
They built 3. In one. What a mess.
Name of car: PAK Gold Standard 400-17
Intended use: EXTREME MUSCLE/Hypercar
Year: 2017
Power & Torque ratings: 1514hp @ 6900 rpm / 1693 nm @ 5100 rpm
Price (prod. cars only): $350K
Turbo or NA: Twin Turbo
Weight: 1575 kg
Format : F-AWD
"Hey, let's build a premium muscle car."
They built 3. In one. What a mess.
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
The power wars are escalating! I feel very un-me-like, having a car surrounded by things 1.5-2 times more powerful on the board
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
The V6 is certainly a good choice, strop. I imagine you could zoom past all of us with some more tinkering.
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
I'm not going to be tinkering with that car any further, because that's how (at least in this version), the car is going to be sold. I'll add that the calculated fuel economy of Salamander is 11.6L/100km, it uses sport compound road +8 tyres, it comes with standard entertainment, and its price tag of 250000 Automation Money Units is with a 40% markup on a Tiny factory because my company is tiny and Australia has significant car taxes for high performance and luxury vehicles
As you can see, I've no problem making the car go fast (see Race car leaderboard where I pretty much abused the sliders to the maximum). And I'd love to put my F-AWD car on the board too (the PAK looks really good, I like it and the fact it'll be a competitor), but... I've already made it several times in the past with a V8 and I'm waiting for V16s with quad turbo supercharging to come out, because that's what it was always meant to be
As you can see, I've no problem making the car go fast (see Race car leaderboard where I pretty much abused the sliders to the maximum). And I'd love to put my F-AWD car on the board too (the PAK looks really good, I like it and the fact it'll be a competitor), but... I've already made it several times in the past with a V8 and I'm waiting for V16s with quad turbo supercharging to come out, because that's what it was always meant to be
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
Haha! Both my PAKs are really unoptimized powerhouses. Massive gas guzzlers with little regard for anything else. Amped up super tyres and a robust suspensions keep them in check. Wish I could do what you did with 800hp.
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
I gave it another shot, with a smaller chassis and the same engine as before. This may be my last race submission, as I plan to stick to front engine vehicles; Though I might try a forced induction route.
With this, it feels like I am approaching the limits for front engine vehicles. Though it feels as if a tad more could be shaved off here too.
Race car airfield submission 2;
Original larger images; http://imgur.com/a/HCHdL
Time; 1:02.80
Name of car: DXM - Wyvern RS
Intended use: Race
Year: 2020
Power & Torque ratings: 1460hp, 976ft-lbs
Turbo or NA: NA
Weight: 1181.0kg
Format: AWD
With this, it feels like I am approaching the limits for front engine vehicles. Though it feels as if a tad more could be shaved off here too.
Race car airfield submission 2;
Original larger images; http://imgur.com/a/HCHdL
Time; 1:02.80
Name of car: DXM - Wyvern RS
Intended use: Race
Year: 2020
Power & Torque ratings: 1460hp, 976ft-lbs
Turbo or NA: NA
Weight: 1181.0kg
Format: AWD
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
Was the tech year limited to 2017 or not?
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
It technically is in the OP, but hey, the screenshot's helpful. That's a lot of g in the small circle test!
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
Tech year is limited to 2017 for production cars, 2020 for race cars.
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
Name of car: Hasszahn Platsch R
Intended use: Race Car
Year: 2020
Power & Torque ratings: 1116 HP@9200RPM/1044NM€6500RPM
Price (prod. cars only): -
Turbo or NA: Turbo
Weight: 1118.6Kg
Format (MR, F-AWD etc.):Mid engine/AWD
Picture of lap time:
Intended use: Race Car
Year: 2020
Power & Torque ratings: 1116 HP@9200RPM/1044NM€6500RPM
Price (prod. cars only): -
Turbo or NA: Turbo
Weight: 1118.6Kg
Format (MR, F-AWD etc.):Mid engine/AWD
Picture of lap time:
Supercharged
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 6:07 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Cars: 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
Gemina Fuglia XRP "Lemonade"
Gemina Fuglia XRP - the testing platform for Gemina XIII's new Customer Assisted Performance Development program is a track exclusive machine made in very limited edition.
It features a naturally aspirated 4.6 liter V12 mounted mid-ship, derived directly from the 3.0l used in the AGP Series. Because of the broad torque curve a 4 speed sequential gearbox was deemed adequate. Aiming maximum driver involvement, the 760PS are sent solely to the rear wheels.
It features a naturally aspirated 4.6 liter V12 mounted mid-ship, derived directly from the 3.0l used in the AGP Series. Because of the broad torque curve a 4 speed sequential gearbox was deemed adequate. Aiming maximum driver involvement, the 760PS are sent solely to the rear wheels.
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
I reckon you'd have a good chance of making your car faster if you went for a 6 or 8 cylinder engine.
Supercharged
Posts: 172
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 6:07 am
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Cars: 2010 Nissan Pathfinder
Re: Automation Airfield Power Lap Times
Microwave wrote:I reckon you'd have a good chance of making your car faster if you went for a 6 or 8 cylinder engine.
You may have a point. I was limited in engine size because of the engine's length. Also, better weight distribution maybe? I'll give it a try. Thanks.
Return to Community Challenges & Competitions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests