FAQ  •  Login

2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

<<

WoarLord

User avatar

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 10:00 pm

Location: Germany RLP

Cars: BMW E90 318i
BMW E36 316i (not more either)
BMW E30 316i (not more, my first)

Post Sun Aug 16, 2015 6:47 pm

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

kerk121 wrote:Same question. PM-ed final revision this morning, it is saying the file is not downloaded yet.



same thing with my car.

I finally want to see how a "supercar" , even thou it's downgraded, would compete with others.


Here are my stats:

Image

Racetiming at Hockenheim GP

Image
Name of Carcompany: PMW - Palatine Motor Works - Pfälzische Motoren Werke
Owner of Company: WoarLord
Forumthread: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=5210
Established : 1946
Company ID: #1946105
<<

RoyalStig

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 75

Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 6:05 am

Location: Wales

Cars: A Mountain Bike

Post Sun Aug 16, 2015 8:44 pm

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Stats for my car: (0-60MPH / 100KMh is 3.2. Top speed is 164.5 MPH / 264.737 KMH)
2015-08-16_00001.jpg
2015-08-16_00001.jpg (401.36 KiB) Viewed 4595 times
Name of Car Company: Griffin Automotive
Owner of company: RoyalStig
Website: http://griffinautomotive.weebly.com/ (WIP)
Established: 31st October 1962 As Griffin Automotive, 2nd April 1955 as 'Ddraig'.
Company ID: #1962021
<<

strop

User avatar

3-Star Beta Tester
3-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 3462

Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:31 pm

Cars: Honda Civic VTI-S MY13

Post Mon Aug 17, 2015 3:23 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Okay, now entries are closed, I'll explain how I went about it: truth be told, while my car looks like a 2016 Lotus Evora, it isn't really at all built like one. I may not be the best at making well-balanced cars that appeal to everybody... but by golly I can make it go fast! The crucial differences are as follows:

First, where the original is an aluminium frame, this one is a carbon tub, with really flimsy polymer panels. For >30k budget scenarios, this is the most cost effective way to cut weight while not compromising on safety (coz carbon chassis gives a massive boost). It also significantly improves road performance.

Second, where the original engine is an aluminium block and headers Toyota 2GR-FE 3.5L V6, I went with cast iron 3.8L. I didn't really need the extra 3hp the iron headers give over aluminium for a 20-something kilo gain, but a) it's cheaper b) in a light MR car, it puts the weight where it counts, and c) there's no other way I was going to make the weight anyway.

Then I sunk massive amounts of tech into the transmission, because that e-diff works wonders and is well worth the price in an all-out race, and obviously the tyres. I'm using tyre tech +13, because any more will give you maybe 0.02s on most tracks and cost you another 5-10 grand. Not worth it. However of all the upgrades I recommend this, and aero, be upgraded the most (aero because it's cheap, but keep in mind if all the tracks are tight and technical, more drag isn't a bad thing).

All in all, these are the stats:

Evorastats.png
Evorastats.png (434.67 KiB) Viewed 4573 times


Spoiler times below (highlight to reveal)
Automation track: 2:06.27
Airfield : 1:14.34
Green Hell: 7:24.39
<<

BassixDnB

User avatar

Posts: 38

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 6:09 am

Cars: None currently.

Post Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:35 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Okay, to clear up the confusion:

If you sent the PM to me BEFORE I made the "Okay everyone! Here's some news" post, and the car meets all the rules, then you're fine.
<<

Sillyworld

User avatar

Posts: 400

Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:48 am

Location: Guadalajara, México

Cars: Mazda 3 hatchback

Post Mon Aug 17, 2015 6:41 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

strop wrote:Spoiler times below (highlight to reveal)
Automation track: 2:06.27
Airfield : 1:14.34
Green Hell: 7:24.39


That's a really fast car! :shock:
My 2016 Snake Coupé doesn't have a chance to win :lol:

strop wrote:Okay, now entries are closed, I'll explain how I went about it: truth be told, while my car looks like a 2016 Lotus Evora, it isn't really at all built like one. I may not be the best at making well-balanced cars that appeal to everybody... but by golly I can make it go fast! The crucial differences are as follows


Thanks for sharing those secrets tho :)
<<

nialloftara

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 1983

Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:07 pm

Location: Northeast USA

Cars: 2006 Scion Xb

Post Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:07 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Should have added more tire quality... Oh well, at least my driver will be comfortable.
Chief designer and CEO, Centauri motor works, Centauri Performance Vehicles (CPV)
"Centauri: The Stars Are Within Your Reach."
Centauri engines Centauri cars
CPV engines CPV cars
Company ID: 1943047
<<

TauSigmaNova

Posts: 40

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 2:03 pm

Cars: I'm a teenager in NYC, you think I have a car?

Post Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:25 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Damn, Strop. I'm impressed. I don't think I'll be losing but I won't be beating you out.


I also used a CF tub + Polymer panels with Double Wishbone front+rear. Cut out most of the quality on the first tab of the model (body) to cut on weight and cost.
0-62 | 2.7 Seconds
Weight | 1000.9 KG
Top Speed | 183.0 MPH (294.5 KPH)

Automation Air Track | 1.18.77
Green Hell | 7:49.50

13 Quality on Tires and 15 on the Aero. I pretty much kept piling on these two until I reached ~35,000 dollars. I found the best way for me to cut time (by about 2 seconds!!) was to manually do the suspension settings by trial and error. Maybe I should've went for the E-LSD because it definitely is a noticeable improvement, but I didn't. Oh well, we'll see how this goes. Wouldn't be surprised If I just end up middle of the pack. I'm also afraid that my rather dismal drivability will end up ruining me.

As for the name - I was looking at the Ferrari 599 while building this. the front originally looked exactly like it but I'm not a fan of the dopey looking face on the 599.

Image
Image
Image
<<

BlastersPewPew

Posts: 628

Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 7:01 am

Cars: Mazda 3

Post Mon Aug 17, 2015 7:55 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Hell, my car might be somewhat competitive even if it is ugly as sin, I probably have the smallest engine to boot as well.

EDIT: Biggest thing that will kill my car is my low driveability, compared to some of the other entries I am going to get hit hard by the RNG god.

MRCSR Stat Com.jpg
MRCSR Stat Com.jpg (169.99 KiB) Viewed 4487 times


I can out stop the strop, I can out accelerate the strop (to 100 at least) but I cant BEAT the strop.............damn you strop!! :P
<<

Sillyworld

User avatar

Posts: 400

Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:48 am

Location: Guadalajara, México

Cars: Mazda 3 hatchback

Post Mon Aug 17, 2015 9:31 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Well, my car is pretty heavy, but at least is quite drivable.
Here are my not-so-impressive numbers:

Automation track: 2:17.78
Airfield track: 1:21.22
Green hell: 7:54.89

Image

Image
<<

Absurdist

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 279

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 9:03 pm

Location: Melbourne - Australia

Cars: 2006 Civic

Someone stole my bike :c

Post Mon Aug 17, 2015 12:24 pm

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Had an export error on my car, so I am not sure if my car will be accepted. :S
"Anything happens in Grand Prix racing, and it usually does." - The great Murry Walker.

I'm on Steam!
Absurdistx
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198041832277/
<<

KLinardo

User avatar

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 471

Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 3:17 pm

Location: Blue Anchor, NJ / Richmond, VA

Cars: 2013 Ford Mustang GT California Special
2010 Ford F-150 XLT

Post Wed Aug 19, 2015 2:07 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Looking at some of these lap times seriously changed how competitive I thought my car would be. I knew I would be at a disadvantage due to weight and my use of the FR sports coupe. I can't even come close to Strop's posted times. I think I'm generally outclassed in this one since I used a different approach than the small car, small turbo conglomerate we see here. The only thing I have going for me is top speed and drivability.
Attachments
Boss 499 Test Track.jpg
Boss 499 Test Track.jpg (86.8 KiB) Viewed 4544 times
Boss 499 Overview.jpg
Boss 499 Overview.jpg (64.09 KiB) Viewed 4544 times
Boss Motorsports
1969302
Company Thread: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=7093
<<

DeusExMackia

User avatar

Posts: 362

Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 1:11 am

Location: Whatlington, Battle, UK

Cars: '04 Seat Arosa 1.0 S

Post Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:02 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Well, here are the stats for the Tauga XR. I accidentally clicked on something before I took the screenshots which has changed the price and some of the performance stats of the vehicle. The costs were around the $33k mark before, and the 0-60 time was 3.0 seconds.
Haven't been able to recitfy the problem even after replacing my files with the ones that I sent to BassixDnB (aka the ones in the .ZIP extracted folder), which either means I've ruined the files or they were the actual ones I sent.

Any chance you could see if the stats in the images below match up with the ones on the car I sent you @BassixDnB?

Image

Image


My car is good when it comes to short distances, especially with that 0-60 time and the quarter mile time, but I doubt it'll be able to keep up with the mid engined sports cars that have been entered.
Still, this is all a learning experience for me as it is only my first competition and in all honesty I just want to see how well the Tauga does against the other cars :lol:
ImageImageImageImage
Company ID: 1959771

The Great Automation Badge Grid - Get your company on the grid

"Spending warm summer days indoors, writing frightening verse to a bucktooth girl in Luxembourg"
<<

kerk121

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 11

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2014 8:58 pm

Cars: Bike

Post Wed Aug 19, 2015 6:53 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

DeusExMackia: go to your sent messages, download the zip file, delete your car and engine from the game, copy files from the archive to where they shoudl be (like drive:\Users\Admin\Documents\My Games\Automation\ ) and restart game- you should see the original car back.

To keep things alive, here are stats for Yix Wandal.
It does not come as good as strop's in the corners, and the driveability is junk (I have overlooked its impact), so let it finish where it deserves.. This was done with "limited budget and time" - without trying other concepts, keeping to AWD and 2.0l lightweight turbo engine -which, I think, is not so bad after all.
Attachments
engine1.JPG
engine1.JPG (156.6 KiB) Viewed 4521 times
stat1.JPG
stat1.JPG (64.08 KiB) Viewed 4521 times
<<

TauSigmaNova

Posts: 40

Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2015 2:03 pm

Cars: I'm a teenager in NYC, you think I have a car?

Post Sun Aug 30, 2015 3:18 am

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Bruh, any updates?
<<

DeusExMackia

User avatar

Posts: 362

Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 1:11 am

Location: Whatlington, Battle, UK

Cars: '04 Seat Arosa 1.0 S

Post Sun Aug 30, 2015 9:32 pm

Re: 2016 MRCSR Time Trial Series

Has the competion been abandoned or something?
ImageImageImageImage
Company ID: 1959771

The Great Automation Badge Grid - Get your company on the grid

"Spending warm summer days indoors, writing frightening verse to a bucktooth girl in Luxembourg"
PreviousNext

Return to Community Challenges & Competitions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests