FAQ  •  Login

Efficient Performance - The Engine Design Challenge

<<

phale

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:56 am

Cars: None

Post Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:52 pm

Efficient Performance - The Engine Design Challenge

How well can you balance power with efficiency?

We've had plenty of car challenges and competitions - how about a plain and simple engine challenge? The goal - design an engine which is powerful, efficient, and reliable. The formula we will be using is

[Performance Index]*[Efficiency^1.5]*[Reliability^0.5]/[Liters]

The efficiency is in %, seen in the final engine tab. Yes, this formula puts a lot of emphasis on efficiency - this is to offset the power density advantage of smaller engines.

Here is the ruleset:
Year 2016 or earlier
Max 95RON
No race intakes
No race exhausts
Must have catalytic converter
Loudness under 60
ALL QUALITY SLIDERS 0 (I will consider opening a separate category for no quality restrictions)

Current leaders:
Turbocharged
USDMFTW - 2083 i6 - 149.1
phale - 1.6L I6-SS Efficient Plus - 144.1
koolkei - 2.5L I4 Turbo - 128.2

Naturally Aspirated
MrChips - CMW X70 B60X0 - 91.5
UMM - I416ECR - 90.1

Simply post a screenshot of the final engine tab in this thread to enter. Don't forget to name your engine something cool if you want ;)
Last edited by phale on Sat Apr 02, 2016 2:33 pm, edited 8 times in total.
<<

phale

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:56 am

Cars: None

Post Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:55 pm

Re: Horsepower per Liter times Efficiency Leaderboards

Here is the best I can come up with, a 1.6L I4 Turbo with 0 quality sliders:

Image

It produces 255HP with 25.72% efficiency, so the calculation is (255/1.600)*(0.2572) = 41.0

Please use as many decimal places as possible in your calculations!
<<

Lordred

User avatar

Posts: 695

Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2015 1:22 pm

Location: California, USA

Cars: 1966 Sunbeam Alpine
1997 Ford Crown Victoria

Post Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:18 pm

Re: Horsepower per Liter times Efficiency Leaderboards

Good idea, but too few metrics used to determin the score.

Not having reliability weigh in means if you use more then 50 reliability you are handicapping yourself.

Score of 42.8
Image
Image
ID: 1963886
<<

phale

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:56 am

Cars: None

Post Wed Mar 30, 2016 4:19 pm

Re: Horsepower per Liter times Efficiency Leaderboards

HP/Liter*Eff*Reliability? That would be pretty interesting. Also, I could use Performance Index instead of HP to prevent setting the rev limiter at the max RPM.

However, I have discovered that this favors small engines too much - I was able to achieve 48.4 with the tiniest possible I4. If reliability is factored in, then small engines will have an even bigger advantage. Any suggestions?
<<

strop

User avatar

3-Star Beta Tester
3-Star Beta Tester

Posts: 3462

Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:31 pm

Cars: Honda Civic VTI-S MY13

Post Wed Mar 30, 2016 4:34 pm

Re: Horsepower per Liter times Efficiency Leaderboards

Any balancing to take the advantage away from small engines would mean putting greater emphasis on higher power output. You may wish to consider multiplying the total power output by a small exponent.
<<

phale

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:56 am

Cars: None

Post Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:27 pm

Re: Horsepower per Liter times Efficiency Leaderboards

Alright, after some experimenting and comparing between various engines, I have come up with a new formula:

[Performance Index]*[Efficiency^1.5]*[Reliability^0.5]/[Liters]

So yes, the new formula weights efficiency above all else, which is interesting because larger engines are generally more efficient, but less power-dense. I was able to get similar numbers from a 0.4L I4, a 2.4L I6, and a 4.0L I6.

By the way, I originally came up with the HP/L*Eff idea because I use it very often as a quick way to determine the quality of an engine. It's easy to calculate at a glance and I can use it to quickly compare different engines. Generally a HP/L*Eff above 30 is good. While it's clearly not a good formula for a competition, I encourage you to design engines with HP/L*Eff in mind - I do that for all of my engines.
<<

phale

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:56 am

Cars: None

Post Wed Mar 30, 2016 8:45 pm

Re: Horsepower per Liter times Efficiency Leaderboards

So this is my best engine under the new formula:

Image

It achieves a score of 135.7

Here is an album comparing a 0.4L engine, 2.4L engine, and 4.0L engine: http://imgur.com/a/p7d4D
The 2.4L scores 135.7
The 4.0L scores 134.9
The 0.4L scores 133.5

Have at it guys! I want to see what you can come up with!
<<

koolkei

User avatar

Posts: 947

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2015 10:35 pm

Cars: a mini 2 wheeled single cyl car :D

Post Thu Mar 31, 2016 12:32 am

Re: Efficient Performance Engine Leaderboards

im trying this.

and here's a simple calc in excel.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1azMNr ... qzjsQjo36g

need somebody to try to open it to verify

and so far, i found that the formula prefers much sportier engines since it only takes into account only the peak power and not overall powerband.

nope, stuck on 128 score.
<<

phale

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:56 am

Cars: None

Post Thu Mar 31, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Efficient Performance Engine Leaderboards

File works for me. I've got a similar excel file which I will use to tally the scores.

Some tips from my experience:
Obviously, VVL is going to be absolutely critical here. If you're unsure about how to tune VVL, TurboJ will hopefully have a video on the topic soon (see this thread). I find that 35 works well for the first cam timing, the second one will vary widely.
Optimize ignition timing for efficiency. Higher is not always better.
The sizing of the bore and stroke is going to be very important. Generally, you want to figure out what RPM will allow for maximum performance index, and set the stroke length so that it can make the max PI with high reliability. (This is something I'm still trying to improve on myself.)
<<

phale

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:56 am

Cars: None

Post Thu Mar 31, 2016 10:00 am

Re: Efficient Performance Engine Leaderboards

Just got a score of 144.1 with a 1.6L I6 Turbo. There's definitely a lot of different approaches to this one ;) There's probably still room for improvement since the rev limiter is right at max HP.

Image

Also comes with a beautiful torque curve as a bonus.
<<

UMM

Posts: 17

Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2014 11:27 am

Cars: Honda Civic Del Sol 1.6 Vtec
Chevrolet Sonic 1.4
Ford Cougar 2.0

Post Thu Mar 31, 2016 10:40 pm

Re: Efficient Performance Engine Leaderboards

Here's my take on a small I4 NA engine :)

Feel free to comment.


Score: 80.3

Image
UMM Leading the future!

UMM Corp.
UMM Motors Division
<<

Manche

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 605

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:22 pm

Location: Montevideo. Uruguay

Cars: none.... sadly

Post Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:20 am

Re: Efficient Performance Engine Leaderboards

I wonder what score i can get from my tractor v8, 6.04 L mohv
<<

phale

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:56 am

Cars: None

Post Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:29 am

Re: Efficient Performance Engine Leaderboards

UMM wrote:Here's my take on a small I4 NA engine :)

Feel free to comment.

Score: 80.3


You're on the leaderboard ;)

Since the equation weights efficiency so heavily though, I think you can do better with a more efficient engine.
<<

phale

Posts: 34

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 3:56 am

Cars: None

Post Fri Apr 01, 2016 2:41 am

Re: Efficient Performance Engine Leaderboards

Manche wrote:I wonder what score i can get from my tractor v8, 6.04 L mohv


Well... MOHV isn't competitive since you don't get access to VVL, but here's a 6.04L V8 DOHC-4 which scores 113.2:

Image
<<

Manche

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 605

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:22 pm

Location: Montevideo. Uruguay

Cars: none.... sadly

Post Fri Apr 01, 2016 3:46 am

Re: Efficient Performance - The Engine Design Challenge

For challenge's sake ;) since I'm an advocate for large engines being simple and reliable which explains the LS family popularity in part
Next

Return to Community Challenges & Competitions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests