new build high eco car-PUSHING HARDER@ 83.3km/l

[koolkei]

i cant find the old thread.

but its just same old "how low can you make the fuel consumption?"

here's my take on it.

XECO - 7544-1.png (957.04 KiB) Viewed 7680 times

achieved with only year 2015, only performance intakes, NA engine with 39% efficiency.

XECO - 7544-2.png (902.31 KiB) Viewed 7680 times

[cpufreak101]

does that say 25 or 75?

[Oskiinus]

Weight: 309 kg. Okay, my oh-f.ck-meter just went out of scale

[koolkei]

that's 75km/l alright

[squidhead]

that's 75km/l alright

So that's like what. 1.3 liter / 100km? O.o

[koolkei]

that's 75km/l alright

So that's like what. 1.3 liter / 100km? O.o

1.304l/100km

that's less than my IRL 135cc daily motorbike....

btw that's is still not pushing it. i could get 76 or 77km/l

[squidhead]

What are the performance stats at that?

[nerd]

Welcome to 'murica.

Big fat slice of 'murica - Standard-1.png (1.06 MiB) Viewed 7464 times

Engine - 1.PNG (1.87 MiB) Viewed 7464 times

Engine - 2.PNG (1.28 MiB) Viewed 7464 times

Equates to 1042L/100km. (and I'm using RON but I know the conversion to AKI)

[strop]

lol nerd that thing must be belching a cloud of petrol smog so thick a single pass from that car alone would kill more people than all the dirty VW diesels in the world combined

[cpufreak101]

i made something in the gallons per mile range once, game reports it as just 0.0MPG though

[thecarlover]

I've gotten 0.4 mpg from a badly tuned transmission on a 60s land barge. I've also got a very lightweight (below 700 kg) sports/track car that gets 100.1 mpg. It costs almost $100,000 but is still somewhat decent in the markets. It was in the high 70s for a couple of things until I used sliders to get it from about 85 mpg to that 100.1. I might have to post that one here.

[koolkei]

100mpg-> 45 km/l

ehehehehe.
75km/l -> 144mpg


i really thought there would be someone that SURELY beats me on that fuel consumption.

[thecarlover]

I might have something with lower consumption than that. My 100.1 mpg one is a mid-engined car, using the smaller McLaren body, and using a 700 cc engine I made for another car. Top speed is about 190 km/h, and a 0-100 takes about 14 seconds. Maybe I should try a 500 cc engine and see how that goes

[Sebesseg]

100mpg-> 45 km/l

ehehehehe.
75km/l -> 144mpg


i really thought there would be someone that SURELY beats me on that fuel consumption.

Perhaps that's b/c (at least according to google) 100mpg -> 42.5km/l and 75km/l -> 176mpg? At least to US MPG, Imperial MPG is a lot more.

Its possible to beat you. I couldn't get my lil engine as efficient as yours using just performance intakes (I was .18% off efficiency...I was using different units, but it shouldn't change that), but no one said we couldn't use race intakes, right? I tried using the not-smart car body, but it comes out a bit too heavy so I switched over to the one you used. I still have an extra ~5kg on yours so if I could find where its at the economy might go up slightly. I thought it was perhaps fixtures, but that didn't do anything so pardon the lack of headlights. Anyway I got 180.5 US MPG or 76.7km/l. I'm sure someone can beat it too.

[thecarlover]

Damn, and I thought my economy was good...

...but I think this might be the lightest car ever made in Automation. It weighs less than a horse. Much less.