FAQ  •  Login

Best Bore/Stroke for Performance

<<

DeltaForce

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 87

Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:47 am

Cars: Mitsubishi Lancer

Post Tue Oct 06, 2015 9:43 pm

Best Bore/Stroke for Performance

Undersquare engines are more suited for low end performance, while oversquare engines are more suited for high end performance. Square engines are something of a compromise between the two. In terms of performance (torque and horsepower output), I was wondering if there is a specific cam profile setting and/or RPM at which it is best to choose one approach over the others. Also, do turbochargers and other forced induction technologies change the general undersquare low/oversquare high pattern, or does it remain largely the same?
<<

nialloftara

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 1983

Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:07 pm

Location: Northeast USA

Cars: 2006 Scion Xb

Post Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:32 am

Re: Best Bore/Stroke for Performance

It really depends on how you're tuning, turbos seem to like a slightly oversquare design in game but their cam profile is dependent more on turbo size and spool speed then the bore and stroke. The limiting factor of undersquare is piston speed, you start to stress your internals at lower rpms the longer your stroke gets so an aggressive cam might be reaching peak performance beyond the rpm capacity of your rods or pistons. over square on the other hand is limited by valve float more often then pistons or rods, more bore means bigger valves and so more valvetrain weight, a higher cam can actually improve reliability by stiffening the springs. So there isn't really one ideal size for any one application, but here's a link that explores a possible real world standard comprise. http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/car-technology/a24855/the-500-cc-cylinder-is-the-way-of-the-future/
Chief designer and CEO, Centauri motor works, Centauri Performance Vehicles (CPV)
"Centauri: The Stars Are Within Your Reach."
Centauri engines Centauri cars
CPV engines CPV cars
Company ID: 1943047
<<

Manche

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 605

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:22 pm

Location: Montevideo. Uruguay

Cars: none.... sadly

Post Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:20 am

Re: Best Bore/Stroke for Performance

nialloftara wrote:It really depends on how you're tuning, turbos seem to like a slightly oversquare design in game but their cam profile is dependent more on turbo size and spool speed then the bore and stroke. The limiting factor of undersquare is piston speed, you start to stress your internals at lower rpms the longer your stroke gets so an aggressive cam might be reaching peak performance beyond the rpm capacity of your rods or pistons. over square on the other hand is limited by valve float more often then pistons or rods, more bore means bigger valves and so more valvetrain weight, a higher cam can actually improve reliability by stiffening the springs. So there isn't really one ideal size for any one application, but here's a link that explores a possible real world standard comprise. http://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/car-technology/a24855/the-500-cc-cylinder-is-the-way-of-the-future/



similar bore/stroke ratios as my HSB engine
<<

victorgarcia

Naturally Aspirated

Posts: 91

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2015 12:20 pm

Cars: Motorcyclist

Post Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:20 am

Re: Best Bore/Stroke for Performance

some remarks, but not general rules:

bigger bore = bigger valves, bigger flow, but heavier valves tend to float
smaller bore = better efficiency due to smaller piston crown and better use of gas expansion

a good engine should be a balance of both, for a given cylinder capacity, if you have a small stroke, and smaller piston travel, you can make use of higher rpms, but the bigger valves will start to float, an then is the opposite way around, small bore, long stroke, the pistons suffering while valves are ok
so pushing the envelopes of you parts at the same time is key for a reliable and powerful engine.

then there's the latest industry tendency of 500cc cylinders with the golden proportions of 82/94.6 bore x stroke, which gives great efficiency, usually mated to turbochargers and spinning no faster than 6-6,5krpm
<<

theh4x0r1337

Posts: 117

Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 9:21 am

Location: antarctica

Cars: benz e63 amg

Post Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:25 am

Re: Best Bore/Stroke for Performance

i usually keep bore and stroke equal
Image Image
<<

oppositelock

User avatar

Silver Supporter
Silver Supporter

Posts: 269

Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:48 pm

Location: California

Cars: Scion FR-S

Post Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:57 pm

Re: Best Bore/Stroke for Performance

My preferred method:

1) Rough out the engine with the general configuration you want. If planning a turbo motor, don't install it yet.
2) Select your desired redline and make sure the engine's not knocking.
3) Increase the stroke until it starts to impact reliability, then drop it back one click.
4) Increase the the bore until either a) you reach your desired displacement or b) valve float starts to affect power. Light green valves are okay, yellow or red are bad.
5) Install the turbo if required, then play with all the sliders until everything is how you want it.
6) If you change your redline, go back to step 3. If you start to get valve float, go back to step 4.
<<

nialloftara

User avatar

Supercharged
Supercharged

Posts: 1983

Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:07 pm

Location: Northeast USA

Cars: 2006 Scion Xb

Post Sat Oct 31, 2015 9:53 pm

Re: Best Bore/Stroke for Performance

Steps 1-3 are my way as well, maximum safe stroke for a given redline is the best way to make a lighter and more efficient engine.
Chief designer and CEO, Centauri motor works, Centauri Performance Vehicles (CPV)
"Centauri: The Stars Are Within Your Reach."
Centauri engines Centauri cars
CPV engines CPV cars
Company ID: 1943047

Return to Engine Sharing Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron