automationgame.com

Posted: **Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:01 am**

Hi everyone, i have a little challenge for you!
I made a 785ccm(47.9cin) v8 Flatpane engine with 267.8Hp(199.7Kw) and 208.4Nm(154ft-lb). The bore is 50mm(1.969inch), the stroke is also 50mm. Max boost is 3bar(44.10Psi)

Try to make a better 785ccm engine!!!! (it does not matter how much cylinder it will have)

Posted: **Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:22 am**

here you go

: 785.jpg (619.53 KiB) Viewed 4090 times

Posted: **Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:31 am**

few more tweaks

: 785.jpg (627.66 KiB) Viewed 4088 times

Posted: **Mon Feb 02, 2015 3:07 pm**

This is a quick one... I agree with kryztal in that using a 4cyl will allow you to use larger bore for a better turbo profile. That's probably the most important part.

: 785.png (1.52 MiB) Viewed 4070 times

I'm very sure more power can easily be gotten from the engine, but what I decided was to balance between that and a good useable powerband, so I placed the engine in trackpaduser's k-car body. The whole thing weighs barely 560kg (most expensive materials, maximum quality most things), so has frightening performance of 0-100 in 2.4s and the quarter mile in under 10, 1:14.5s around Airfield and 2:8.22 around Automation test track... without me really optimising most of the trim. I just made the engine to suit the car.

Posted: **Mon Feb 02, 2015 3:20 pm**

strop wrote:This is a quick one... I agree with kryztal in that using a 4cyl will allow you to use larger bore for a better turbo profile. That's probably the most important part.

785.png

I'm very sure more power can easily be gotten from the engine, but what I decided was to balance between that and a good useable powerband, so I placed the engine in trackpaduser's k-car body. The whole thing weighs barely 560kg (most expensive materials, maximum quality most things), so has frightening performance of 0-100 in 2.4s and the quarter mile in under 10, 1:14.5s around Airfield and 2:8.22 around Automation test track... without me really optimising most of the trim. I just made the engine to suit the car.

Thankfully the brick aerodynamics help slowing it down slightly.

But that's a bit mad.

I don't even want to imagine what will happen when a cappucino or AZ-1 body gets added to the game, as it would be even lighter.

Posted: **Mon Feb 02, 2015 7:48 pm**

And less draggy too! I like my cars to have 1hp:kg... This falls a bit short. But it's still quickish! :lol:

Posted: **Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:33 am**

Here you go! my Mini JZ

automationgame.com

Try to make a better 785ccm engine!! (267.8HP, 208.4Nm)

Try to make a better 785ccm engine!! (267.8HP, 208.4Nm)

Re: Try to make a better 785ccm engine!! (267.8HP, 208.4Nm)

Re: Try to make a better 785ccm engine!! (267.8HP, 208.4Nm)

Re: Try to make a better 785ccm engine!! (267.8HP, 208.4Nm)

Re: Try to make a better 785ccm engine!! (267.8HP, 208.4Nm)

Re: Try to make a better 785ccm engine!! (267.8HP, 208.4Nm)

Re: Try to make a better 785ccm engine!! (267.8HP, 208.4Nm)