Mitsubishi 4G63
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
I've gone through and created my first engine based off of a real one. This is modeled after the 4G63 in the 2nd gen Eclipses 96-99. It's almost identical in power, 210 HP, 210 ft/lbs TQ (real ones have 214) with a 7K redline. I tried modeling the turbo specs correctly, but could be all wrong with those
Silver Supporter
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:38 am
Location: York, England
Cars: Maybe a Peugeot 107 in the near future :)
Re: Mitsubishi 4G63
You might want to reduce the stroke and increase the bore... your bottom end (like it says on the picture) is reducing MTBF, you can easily reach 65,000km MTBF (or 40,000 miles MTBF) if you do so. Also you have a very low octane so increase the compression. Other than that, it is a good version of the 2nd gen Eclipses
Naturally Aspirated
Posts: 397
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 5:00 pm
Cars: 2000 Saturn SL2
Look i have DOHC :P
Re: Mitsubishi 4G63
09webbad wrote:You might want to reduce the stroke and increase the bore... your bottom end (like it says on the picture) is reducing MTBF, you can easily reach 65,000km MTBF (or 40,000 miles MTBF) if you do so. Also you have a very low octane so increase the compression. Other than that, it is a good version of the 2nd gen Eclipses
You have to use the factory bore x stroke or it would not be said engine
Hawker Cars Inc. EST 1946
http://www.automationhub.net/company-catalog/company/43
http://www.automationhub.net/company-catalog/company/43
Silver Supporter
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:38 am
Location: York, England
Cars: Maybe a Peugeot 107 in the near future :)
Re: Mitsubishi 4G63
hmm, good point
Re: Mitsubishi 4G63
Remember, 2nd gen, 7 bolt main....crankwalk. They are already ticking time bombs! This game is accurate!
but for those who don't know what crankwalk is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFGGeIw5dwA
but for those who don't know what crankwalk is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFGGeIw5dwA
Re: Mitsubishi 4G63
Have you tried modifying your ignition timing up for the extra 4 hp ? or up something just one, seems like that would do it good job anyway
6 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Engine Sharing Forum
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests