FAQ  •  Login

The Ford Sierra Engine reviews

<<

Juno8

User avatar

Turbocharged
Turbocharged

Posts: 788

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:53 am

Location: somewhere on the Australian Outback roads in my 1973 Ford XB GT Falcon

Cars: The Mad Max 1973 Ford XB GT Falcon

In Reality...Passed my driving test 13th July 2015

Driving: 2011 Volvo V60 D5

Post Wed Mar 27, 2013 12:38 pm

The Ford Sierra Engine reviews

Comment down below what I could do better please here or more likely on the video please guys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpqK8-hPRjc
Image
Slogan:
Weiand: Coming to a rear bumper near you!
Its my company car of my dreams :)

Car Company: ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Cars
<<

Killrob

User avatar

Developer - Lead Beta Tester/Producer/German Efficiency Expert
Developer - Lead Beta Tester/Producer/German Efficiency Expert

Posts: 3711

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:00 am

Location: Lower Hutt, New Zealand

Cars: I owned a Twingo... totally bad-ass!

Post Wed Mar 27, 2013 7:28 pm

Re: The Ford Sierra Engine reviews

1) Forum posts: Better punctuation and articulation in your forum posts.
2) Video length: Why watch a 20min video when you easily could fire up Automation yourself to play a scenario?
3) Pacing: The first minute's content could easily be compressed into 10 seconds. The first 6 minutes into about 45-60 seconds.
4) Non-useful information, lots of it: People with eyes can see what components were chosen, you just reading them out loud won't be of any use or interest to most people.
5) No content worthy of the viewer's time: You don't add any insights, analysis, interesting comparisons or fun anecdotes. At least one of these is a vital ingredient for good vids.
<<

xABSOLUTIONx

User avatar

Turbocharged
Turbocharged

Posts: 646

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:05 am

Location: Latvia <3

Cars: BMW E36 323i Coupe

Post Wed Mar 27, 2013 8:20 pm

Re: The Ford Sierra Engine reviews

Killrob wrote:1) Forum posts: Better punctuation and articulation in your forum posts.
2) Video length: Why watch a 20min video when you easily could fire up Automation yourself to play a scenario?
3) Pacing: The first minute's content could easily be compressed into 10 seconds. The first 6 minutes into about 45-60 seconds.
4) Non-useful information, lots of it: People with eyes can see what components were chosen, you just reading them out loud won't be of any use or interest to most people.
5) No content worthy of the viewer's time: You don't add any insights, analysis, interesting comparisons or fun anecdotes. At least one of these is a vital ingredient for good vids.


see, Killrob says the same thing as i do, just did format it better

FIX IT :mrgreen:
<<

Juno8

User avatar

Turbocharged
Turbocharged

Posts: 788

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:53 am

Location: somewhere on the Australian Outback roads in my 1973 Ford XB GT Falcon

Cars: The Mad Max 1973 Ford XB GT Falcon

In Reality...Passed my driving test 13th July 2015

Driving: 2011 Volvo V60 D5

Post Wed Mar 27, 2013 10:58 pm

Re: The Ford Sierra Engine reviews

Thanks killRob :)
Image
Slogan:
Weiand: Coming to a rear bumper near you!
Its my company car of my dreams :)

Car Company: ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Cars

Return to Engine Sharing Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron