Page 1 of 1

2012 Ford Zetec RoCam 1.6L Flex fuel

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:31 am
by bodi
This is as close i could get to my current car engine, it's a flex fuel and i tried the values using pure ethanol (that according to wikipedia has a RON of 108.6). Will update if I can find more details.

  Code:
Engine specs         manufacturer data           automation
Bore                 82,07                       82,00
Stroke               75,50                       75,50
Head type            SOHC two valves             SOHC two valves
Fuel System          MPFI                        MPFI
Exaust               Short Cast headers          Short Cast Headers
Capacity             1598cc                      1595cc
Compression          12,3:1                      12,3:1
Torque               149,99Nm @ 4,250RPM         149Nm @ 4,200RPM
Power                107,3Cv @ 5,500RPM          108CV @ 5900RPM

Zetec.jpg
Zetec.jpg (274.33 KiB) Viewed 3692 times

Re: 2012 Ford Zetec RoCam 1.6L Flex fuel

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:51 am
by Daffyflyer
Yeah, you won't be able to get it 100% right as not only does ethanol have a higher RON, it also has a higher energy density (sort of, less energy per unit of fuel, but you can run more fuel for the same quantity of air, I think its stochiometric ratio is something like 9:1?)

Re: 2012 Ford Zetec RoCam 1.6L Flex fuel

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:22 pm
by bodi
Yeah, there is that too I am trying a few engines here but the game don't like the compression ratios used on our cars :P . I still find it amusing that almost all engines produced today (flex fuel) here use a compression ratio of at least 12:1 or even close to 14:1 and still can run on our gasohol (94 RON) without pinging using only MPFI since there is no car that uses DI around.

Re: 2012 Ford Zetec RoCam 1.6L Flex fuel

PostPosted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:55 pm
by PhillipM
There's also the cooler inlet charge from the higher latent heat of vaporisation.