Posts: 953
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 4:07 pm
Location: Eastern Time Zone, USA
Cars: I, being poor, have only my dreams
Posts: 953
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 4:07 pm
Location: Eastern Time Zone, USA
Cars: I, being poor, have only my dreams
Posts: 695
Joined: Wed Apr 15, 2015 1:22 pm
Location: California, USA
Cars: 1966 Sunbeam Alpine
1997 Ford Crown Victoria
Queen of Track Building
Posts: 1613
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2013 11:47 am
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Cars: Chevy Cobalt
Posts: 953
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 4:07 pm
Location: Eastern Time Zone, USA
Cars: I, being poor, have only my dreams
2-Star Beta Tester
Posts: 877
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Montreal, Canadia
Cars: 2006 Suzuki Swift+
Posts: 953
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2015 4:07 pm
Location: Eastern Time Zone, USA
Cars: I, being poor, have only my dreams
Packbat wrote:...I just got 318.8 Desirability on Premium Budget in 1955. V12s are bonkers good.
TrackpadUser wrote:Yeah, I think they might be a tad too OP.
These two cars are meant for the City Premium demographic. First one has a 2L V12, second one has a high-tech 1.3L I4.
The stats aren't massively different, except for prestige and production units. The end result is that both cars have around 104 competitiveness in the city premium demographic.
2-Star Beta Tester
Posts: 877
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2014 3:20 pm
Location: Montreal, Canadia
Cars: 2006 Suzuki Swift+
TrackpadUser wrote:In L/100km
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests