Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:53 pm
Combinations
I wonder wich combination is the best. I like Wankel engines like used in a Mazda RX7 or a boxer in the Porsches... but maybe there is a better combination possible.
Combinations
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Sun May 01, 2011 3:26 am
Re: Combinations
personally i like AWD the best; how the cylinders are sorted in the engine isnt that important to me
SIR! We're surrounded by enemies!
Excellent! Now we can attack in ALL directions.
Excellent! Now we can attack in ALL directions.
Turbocharged
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:41 am
Location: Birdland
Cars: 1986 Ford F-250 Diesel, 1971 Datsun 240Z, 2002 Saab 9-3 SE
Sun May 01, 2011 5:35 am
Re: Combinations
I went with Boxer and another configuration..
One of my plans is for front mounted boxer engines, Transaxel gearbox and RWD.
Im not sure its been done before, but I want to do it!
One of my plans is for front mounted boxer engines, Transaxel gearbox and RWD.
Im not sure its been done before, but I want to do it!
Turbocharged
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:48 am
Location: Oude Pekela, The Netherlands
Cars: 1985 Alfa Romeo GTV6
2002 Fiat Stilo Abarth
Sun May 01, 2011 6:38 am
Re: Combinations
I basically selected the following:
boxer with a AWD combination.
boxer with another combination (RWD for example).
V engine (V6-V8-V10-V12) with a FR combination.
V engine (V6-V8-V10-V12) with a MR combination.
Wankel with a FR combination.
@Drake: I like the idea of a transaxle boxer.
Good thinking, would be a nice alternative to the classic layouts.
boxer with a AWD combination.
boxer with another combination (RWD for example).
V engine (V6-V8-V10-V12) with a FR combination.
V engine (V6-V8-V10-V12) with a MR combination.
Wankel with a FR combination.
@Drake: I like the idea of a transaxle boxer.
Good thinking, would be a nice alternative to the classic layouts.
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests